Agenda and minutes
Venue: Conference Room 4B - Tŷ Hywel. View directions
Contact: Clerk: Kathryn Hughes Deputy Clerk: Buddug Saer
Introductions, apologies and declaration of interests
1.1 The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting and noted one
apology from Ann-Marie Harkin, Audit Wales.
1.2 The Chair noted that this would be the last meeting for
Ann Beynon and Nia Morgan. He thanked Ann for her commitment and contributions
during her tenure. Ann would be given the opportunity to share her reflections
on membership of the Committee later in the meeting.
1.3 The Chair also expressed his appreciation for Nia, who
would be leaving the Senedd Commission to take up a new post in January 2023.
During the meeting, he noted his thanks for her briefings, support and
proficiency over the past few years.
1.4 The Committee welcomed Simon Hart, interim Director of
Finance as an observer to the meeting and the Committee looked forward to
working with him in the new year.
1.5 No interests were declared.
Minutes of 15 June, actions and matters arising
ARAC (22-06) Paper 1 – Draft Minutes of 15 June 2022
ARAC (22-06) Paper 2 – Summary of actions
2.1 The minutes of the 15 June meeting were formally
approved and updates to the actions were noted.
2.2 The Chair referenced two informal meetings for the record. On 8 July, the Committee received a presentation from Public Sector Broadband Authority (PSBA) and on 14 September, the Committee received an update from the sustainability team on the Commission’s progress towards decarbonisation and received a presentation on the Cardiff Heat Network.
Senedd Reform - Corporate update
ARAC (22-06) Paper 3 - Senedd Reform Programme Update
3.1 The Chair thanked Siwan Davies and her team for the
thorough and well-presented documentation, which included the papers presented
to the recent Senedd Reform Programme Board meeting.
3.2 On 15 June, the Committee considered the Senedd Reform
corporate risk in depth. On 7 October, the Executive Board agreed the terms of
reference and membership of the Senedd Reform Programme Board (‘the SRPB’) and
these were included in the papers.
3.3 Siwan outlined the governance arrangements for managing
all of the elements of the reform agenda, of which the SRPB formed a part, as
outlined in the diagram at Annex A. As well as preparing for the parliamentary
business of the Seventh Senedd, this also included co-ordinating and supporting
the passage of the Senedd Reform Bill and the reform of the Determination on
Members’ Pay and Allowances, and delivering the Ways of Working Programme and
business as usual.
3.4 Siwan referred to the establishment of the Senedd
Commission-Welsh Government Joint Assurance Board, terms of reference for which
were included in the papers. She also referred to the high-level timeline and
milestones, also included in the papers, which included progress to date. In
terms of the budget, Siwan confirmed that there would be a set of common
assumptions with the Welsh Government and the Independent Remuneration Board,
and a single source of information on costings.
3.5 Siwan referred to the Senedd Reform risk included in the
papers and highlighted the additional risks around the potential impact of the
changing economic climate on budgets, capacity, and political decisions on the
direction of travel.
3.6 The Chair was assured that the appropriate governance
arrangements were in place and wanted to discuss the timeline, co-ordination
and project management, and the dependency on the Independent Remuneration
3.7 Ann Beynon was also assured by the approach to project
management and asked for clarity around whether the risks were for the Welsh
Government or the Commission to manage. She also wanted to ensure that someone
had an overview of any deterioration in views, such as a potential legal
challenge and the capacity of local authorities to run the elections. Ann also
wanted to discuss the timetable, in particular around the boundary review
taking place after Royal Assent and the decision to remain in Tŷ Hywel in the Seventh
3.8 Aled Eirug also questioned political support for the
boundary review and asked how potentially contentious issues around
constituencies would be managed. He also asked for clarity on how officials
were dealing with the relationship and inter-dependencies of the parliamentary
project and the Ways of Working Programme.
3.9 Siwan and Anna responded to these points, as follows:
a. The potential for legal challenge was captured on the Welsh Government’s risk register and a Joint Assurance Board risk register would be created.
b. The internal arrangements for the Commission, Executive Board, the Senedd Reform Programme Board, and the Ways of Working Programme Board were aligned, in sequence and working ... view the full minutes text for item 3.
G&A update report (inc. progress on IA activity)
4.1 Gareth Watts provided an oral update on audit and wider
governance activity. This supplemented an update he had shared with Committee
members on 26 October.
4.2 Gareth noted his thanks to Kathryn Hughes and the team
for completing all Governance Matters meetings with each Head of Service and
for updating and issuing templates and
guidance for gathering assurance. The guidance had been enhanced to make it
more explicit around capturing corporate assurances. The process had also been
adapted to take on board emerging best practice from a “golden thread” project
being led by HM Treasury and the Government Internal Audit Agency. The
Committee noted that the project had not raised any learning points for the
Commission and had provided further assurance that best practice was followed.
It was also noted that the Commission’s approach was shared with other
organisations, and how this might inform best practice for the government
4.3 Gareth also provided updates to the Committee on other
activity as follows:
a. he and his team had completed
a desktop exercise to inform an effectiveness review of Executive Board and
Leadership Team which would be discussed with its members in the coming weeks;
b. he had completed an
effectiveness review of the Independent Remuneration Board and had shared his
draft report with Siwan Davies and Anna Daniel before discussing it with the
c. he had recently attended a
CIPFA Cymru conference which had covered global and UK-wide risks, noting that
cyber no longer featured in the top ten risks - he offered to share his notes
and slides with Committee members;
d. the Commission’s co-sourced
internal audit partner contract had been awarded to Haines Watts for the next
four years (for the past eight years this service had been carried out by
TIAA), and they had completed their first audit on Key Financial Controls, the
report on which Gareth hoped to circulate before Christmas; and
e. he had completed his audit of
Members’ expenses, with no recommendations and he would work with the Members’
Business Support team on future taxation implications for Members.
4.4 Gareth added that he had been discussing the scope of an advisory review to be carried out by Haines Watts on Business Continuity, using their expertise and extensive knowledge of this area. The Cyber-security assurance audit would also be carried out by Haines Watts, the report on which would be circulated out of committee. He also referred to the work he was due to undertake around assurance relating to the Regulatory Framework risks.
Internal Audit Report
ARAC (22-06) Paper 4 – Official Languages Scheme (OLS)
5.1 The Committee welcomed Mair Parry-Jones and Sarah Dafydd
to the meeting.
5.2 Aled Eirug led the discussion which focussed on
monitoring compliance with the OLS, skills, learning, induction and use of
Welsh across the Senedd Commission and by Members and their support staff.
5.3 In terms of monitoring compliance with the OLS, Sarah
Dafydd described the work to be taken forward by a Task and Finish Group to
strengthen the systems in place. This would include considering how to make
more use of the Welsh language co-ordinators in each service area and linking
with the Welsh Language Commission and the Welsh Government to share ideas and
5.4 Sarah also outlined how those wishing to learn Welsh
would capture this in the Personal Development Record (PDR) and the importance
of line managers’ understanding of the time commitment. The OLS team also
worked with service areas and Members and their staff to carry out learning
needs analysis and to identify the best teaching methods to suit the learners.
The Committee noted the supportive approach, as opposed to the use of targets
for learners as everyone’s needs were different and the potential barriers to
progression for more senior staff due to time constraints. They would also be
developing a Cynllun Hyder (Confidence Plan) to encourage Welsh speakers and
learners to use their skills.
5.5 Ken Skates commented on a visible increase in the use of
the Welsh language in the Siambr which was likely to further increase the
numbers using and learning Welsh. Officials noted an increased demand where
Members were pro-actively asking the tutors for help with learning or
5.6 Ann Beynon raised a related point around ensuring
non-Welsh speakers or learners were appreciative of working in a bilingual
environment and understanding the Welsh identity and culture. This was covered
through induction and ongoing awareness and monitoring of compliance with the
5.7 The Committee then asked for an update on using MS Teams
for bilingual meetings. Arwyn advised that, whilst it was now technically
possible to use the translation functionality on MS Teams, ICT were working
with the Welsh Government to test its effectiveness and reliability. This would
then be tested further for internal meetings before considering its use for
formal business. Arwyn added that the
use of Zoom had become more widespread for bilingual meeting since it had
improved its security features.
5.8 Mair wanted to record her thanks to Sarah Dafydd and her
team for their efforts and progress over recent years and their success in
embedding the OLS as business as usual in the organisation.
5.9 The Committee thanked Gareth for the audit report and Sarah and Mair for their contributions. It was evident that the OLS was in a positive position but welcomed the good practice exercise to be undertaken with the Welsh Language Commission and the Welsh Government.
Audit Wales update report (inc. AW reports/outputs)
ARAC (22-06) Paper 5 - Audit Wales update
6.1 Gareth Lucey introduced the Audit Wales update. The
Commission’s Annual Report and Accounts had been certified by Ann-Marie Harkin and
laid with the Senedd on 30 June. Audit Wales would be in a position to issue
their invoice, which was currently below their initial estimate, before the end
6.2 Planning for the 2022-23 audit process had been
disrupted by the introduction of a revised International Auditing Standards 315
(ISA 315). As a result, Audit Wales would not be in a position to issue the
formal Audit Plan until the 28 April ARAC meeting, but would present an outline
plan at the 13 February meeting.
6.3 Gareth then described the consequences of the revised
ISA 315 to the accounts and audit process for 2022-23. It required a more
detailed risk assessment during the planning work, the results of which would
determine the level of further audit testing required.
6.4 These changes could potentially impact the timing of the
audit, as more planning time and upfront testing may be needed, although this
may reduce the level of final audit testing due the lower risk of material
mis-statements. There was also a potential impact on costs as more experienced
staff would need to be involved in the planning stage. The estimated fee
increase for local government bodies was between 12 and 18% but the impact on
the Commission’s audit fee would become clearer once planning work had been
6.5 Gareth also referenced wider Audit Wales outputs that
had recently been published, highlighting the reports on the National Fraud
Initiative and Learning from Cyber Attacks, both published in October 2022, and
Time To Change – Poverty in Wales, published in November 2022.
6.6 The Chair thanked Gareth for the update. He expressed concern around the potential increase in fees caused by the revised ISA 315, especially in the current financial climate. It was important that the Senedd Commission saw some benefits from the increased scrutiny involved under the new standard. He had asked Audit Wales to keep the Committee updated on progress and a regular series of update meetings had been agreed.
· Outline audit plan to be presented at the 13 February meeting with the detailed plan at the 28 April meeting.
ARAC (22-06) Paper 6 – Update on 2022-23 Financial
Position and 2023-24 Budget
7.1 Nia Morgan’s update described the latest financial
position for 2022-23, including details of the supplementary budgets. The paper
had also outlined details of the 2023-24 budget, and Nia confirmed that this
had been approved by Plenary on 16 November.
7.2 In response to questions from the Committee, Nia and
Manon provided further details on the investment in Facilities which included
essential building maintenance and strengthening a point of vulnerability
identified by Security during a recent protest.
7.3 Arwyn also provided further details on the investment in tools for developing engagement with the electorate, which included a Customer Relationship Management system and online engagement tool. This would better facilitate engagement and ways of gathering evidence and consultation responses to inform the work of Senedd Committees, and capturing feedback on the experiences of visitors to the estate.
PAPAC and Finance Committee update
8.1 Nia Morgan, Manon Antoniazzi and Ken Skates had recently
given evidence at both Public Accounts and Public Administration Committee (PAPAC)
and Finance Committee. Additional information, including copies of reports and
the Commission’s responses had been shared with Committee members ahead of this
meeting, on 8 November. The PAPAC report, which was expected by early December,
would also be shared.
8.2 The Committee noted the positive Finance Committee
Report in particular and had welcomed all the additional information sent to
them. The Committee also thanked Nia for the briefings and support she had
provided outside of the formal meetings.
· Clerking team to circulate the PAPAC report when available.
ARAC (22-06) Paper 7 – Departure Summary
9.1 The Committee noted the departures from normal
9.2 In response to questions from Committee members around the renewal of the Broadcasting Service contract, Arwyn described how the Commission would continue to seek improvements to the service during regular discussions with the contractor. This would include discussions around upgrading Senedd TV.
ARAC (22-06) Paper 8 – Corporate Risk
ARAC (22-06) Paper 8 – Annex A - Summary Corporate Risk Register
ARAC (22-06) Paper 8 – Annex B – Corporate Risks plotted
10.1 The Committee noted the updates in the Commission’s Corporate Risk Register. The Chair noted that the risks around Senedd Reform, Cyber-security and Capacity and Capability were covered as substantive agenda items.
Critical examination of one identified or emerging risk or issue - Corporate Capacity and Capability risk
Oral item (referring to the update in the Corporate Risk
11.1 Ed Williams provided an overview of the Commission’s
management of the risks around capacity and capability to support the Corporate
Delivery Plan, which now incorporated the two main transformation programmes
for Senedd Reform and Ways of Working. He outlined how workforce planning was
being revisited in light of this.
11.2 Ed referred to the diagram at Annex B in paper 3,
highlighting that service, capacity and medium-term financial planning were
integral parts of the governance around delivery of the transformation
programmes and business as usual activities within the Corporate Delivery Plan.
He also referred to the main themes of the Ways of Working Programme and how
the planning process would help ensure that the Commission had the right
capacity in the right places.
11.3 Lowri Williams outlined how the Commission had been
consistently workforce planning for several years, including through the
pandemic where staff had been redeployed to deliver priority services. She
added that Heads of Service appreciated the importance of effective capacity
planning and described the detailed exercise they had carried out over the
summer to identify any efficiency savings and consider opportunities to deliver
services differently. Lowri also outlined the challenges around budget
constraints and responding to a changing market in terms of recruitment and how
the roll-out of new service planning templates would facilitate workforce
planning into 2024-25.
11.4 In response to questions from Committee members, Lowri
described the ways in which information on skills was being gathered as part of
the planning and performance management processes. She also outlined how
resilience was being strengthened through, for example, leadership and
parliamentary development programmes. The new service plans would also capture
details of any additional capacity and new skills needed to deliver the Senedd
11.5 The Chair noted that, alongside capacity and capability
risks, there were also wider risks as the Commission implemented its Ways of
Working Strategy. In response to this and further questions around the role of,
and relationship with, the Programme Office, Ed and Manon outlined how the new
Strategic Planning Unit, consisting of repurposed posts, would be adopting a
more holistic portfolio management approach to change. This would be overseen
by the Executive Board which would be responsible for decision-making. The new
Unit would be responsible for developing reporting mechanisms to the Executive
Board, dovetailing with the reports it receives from the Programme Office. Ed
agreed to provide a briefing note for the Committee members with further
details on how this would work in practice.
· Ed to provide further briefing to the Committee on the governance and change management arrangements to deliver the Corporate Delivery Plan.
Update on Cyber Security
ARAC (22-06) Paper 9 – Cyber Security Assurance Report
12.1 The Chair welcomed Mark Neilson, Jamie Hancock and Tim Bernat
to the meeting to present this item.
12.2 Tim Bernat introduced the latest Cyber Security
Assurance Report and described the current threat landscape. He outlined how
the implementation of a new Security Operations Centre (SOC) in December would
further improve the Commission’s detection capability, and provide a dedicated
24/7/365 team of cyber security analysts and engineers. He added that a Cyber
Security Officer post had been approved to increase resilience within the team.
12.3 The Committee welcomed this update and thanked the team
for producing such a comprehensive assurance report. The Chair asked officials
to consider the level of detail in future reports in terms of the background
information and to highlight any changes since the previous updates.
12.4 Committee members asked for further details around
awareness-raising, including plans for the proposed cyber events, and training,
including the potential for mandatory training.
12.5 Mark confirmed that the new post would help facilitate
a focus on raising awareness of cyber risks, and training for Commission staff,
as well as Members and their staff. Manon added that decisions on making any
training mandatory would need to be taken by the Commission. Arwyn advised that
he had raised this at one of the regular meetings he and Mark had with the
Commissioner, Rhun ap Iorwerth MS around ICT. Ken Skates suggested that each
party group could be approached about mandating training for Members and their
support staff as this had been done for
other areas in the past.
12.6 Tim also confirmed that the team was actively planning a cyber awareness event for 2023 and would be developing a cyber engagement strategy.
REWAC update and Reflections from Ann Beynon on membership of ARAC
13.1 Ann Beynon thanked the Chair for allowing time for her
to share her reflections. She had been grateful for the opportunity to work
with a public sector organisation and had found the work of the Committee
13.2 She congratulated officials on the professional quality
of the papers, particularly in relation to finance and commented on the
meaningful approach to internal audit.
13.3 Ann also thanked the Chair for the regular discussions
outside of the formal meetings, which she felt had helped increase her
knowledge of Senedd Commission activity. She encouraged continued development
of the work of the Committee, commenting on the complexity of advisory
committees and boards as the Senedd evolved and the need for them to work
13.4 Whilst her exposure to officials had been limited more
recently due to the pandemic, she commented on the polite, respectful,
positive, and confident culture and supportive environment she had encountered.
She urged senior management to be mindful of the impact of external pressures
on this culture and to consider how individuals responded differently to
pressure, suggesting this could be covered in training for managers. She also
commented on the importance of providing honest feedback to staff and in a
polite manner in line with the values of dignity and respect.
13.5 Her final remarks were to encourage officials to look after themselves and each other.
Review the committee's terms of reference
ARAC (22-06) Paper 10 - current Terms of Reference
14.1 The Committee agreed no changes were needed to its Terms of Reference.
Results of the Committee's effectiveness survey
ARAC (22-06) Paper 11 – Report on ARAC Effectiveness Survey
15.1 The Chair thanked the Clerking team for producing the detailed report on their analysis of the survey results. He was pleased with the scores which reinforced his views on the ongoing effectiveness of the Committee. He thanked everyone for completing the survey and in particular for the helpful comments provided.
Forward work programme
ARAC (22-06) Paper 12 – Forward Work Programme
16.1 The forward work programme was noted and would be shared out of committee for comment.
Any Other Business
17.1 The Chair paid tribute to Catharine Bray, Head of Finance who was retiring from the Senedd Commission in the coming weeks. He wished to thank her for her overwhelming support and noted that her technical knowledge and expertise had been very much valued and appreciated. He also reiterated his thanks to Nia for her support and guidance over the past few years.
Next meeting is scheduled for 13 February 2023.