Decision details
Welsh Conservatives Debate
Decision Maker: Plenary - Fourth Assembly
Status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Purpose:
Debates are one of the
most frequent items of business on the Plenary
agenda. Many types of debate are brought forward in Plenary, including:
- Opposition party debates on a topic of
their choice;
Other than in the case of
Government debates, the time allocated for all other types of debates and their
frequency are determined by the Business
Committee
Decision:
The item started at 15:36.
Voting on the
motion and amendments under this item was deferred until Voting Time.
A vote was taken on the motion without amendment:
NDM4977 William
Graham (South Wales East)
The National Assembly for Wales:
1. Notes the contents of the paper ‘Together for Health – Why change is needed’ which was presented to the Welsh Government's cabinet on 13 March 2012.
2. Regrets that the Welsh Government has failed to share its intentions until now with the people of Wales regarding the future of the Welsh NHS.
Together for Health- Why change is needed" can be accessed on the following link:
http://wales.gov.uk/about/cabinet/cabinetmeetings/4thassembly/13mar12/?lang=en
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
19 |
0 |
27 |
46 |
The motion without amendment not agreed.
The following
amendments were tabled:
Amendment 1 – Jane
Hutt (Vale of Glamorgan)
Delete point 2.
A vote was taken on Amendment 1:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
23 |
0 |
24 |
47 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20 the Deputy Presiding
Officer exercised his casting vote by voting against the motion. Therefore,
amendment 1 was not agreed.
Amendment 2 – Peter
Black (South Wales West)
Add as a new point at end of motion:
Calls on the Welsh Government to provide full details of the proposed changes at the earliest opportunity so as to facilitate informed debates at a local level.
A vote was taken on Amendment 2:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
23 |
0 |
24 |
47 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20 the Deputy Presiding
Officer exercised his casting vote by voting against the motion. Therefore,
amendment 2 was not agreed.
As the Assembly
did not agree the motion without amendment, and did not agree the amendments
tabled to the motion, the motion was therefore not agreed.
Publication date: 09/05/2012
Date of decision: 09/05/2012
Decided at meeting: 09/05/2012 - Plenary - Fourth Assembly