Decision details
Plaid Cymru Debate
Decision Maker: Plenary - Fourth Assembly
Status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Purpose:
Debates are one of the
most frequent items of business on the Plenary
agenda. Many types of debate are brought forward in Plenary, including:
- Opposition party debates on a topic of
their choice;
Other than in the case of
Government debates, the time allocated for all other types of debates and their
frequency are determined by the Business
Committee
Decision:
The item started at 16.49
Voting on the motion and amendments under this item was
deferred until Voting Time.
A
vote was taken on the motion without amendment:
NDM5379 Elin Jones (Ceredigion)
To propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1. Notes:
a) that the estimated funding gap between the demand for
finance from Welsh businesses and the current supply from the banking sector is
£500 million;
b) that non-domestic rates account for a significant
proportion of operating costs for micro and small businesses;
c) that a 1% increase in the rate of public sector
procurement contracts that go to Welsh businesses creates 2,000 new jobs; and
d) that Wales’ natural resources offer significant potential
for economic benefit.
2. Regrets:
a) that Welsh GVA per capita is the lowest of all UK nations
at 75.2% of the UK;
b) that macro-economic levers remain in the hands of MPs in
the UK Parliament but recognises that the Welsh Government has a significant
role to play in growing the Welsh economy;
c) the absence of up-to-date economic indicators for Wales;
d) the failure of Welsh Government to tackle unemployment and
underemployment; and
e) the failure of public sector bodies to implement Welsh
Government policy on procurement.
3. Calls on the Welsh Government:
a) to publish a comprehensive and long-term plan for growing
the Welsh economy;
b) to impress upon the Office for National Statistics the
need to provide regular and frequent economic indicators for Wales;
c) to adopt the Party of Wales’ policy to extend small
business rate relief to all businesses with a rateable value of £15,000 or
less; and
d) to explore the benefits of establishing a publicly-owned,
arm’s length, not-for-distributable-profit business development bank.
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
10 |
0 |
46 |
56 |
The motion without amendment was not agreed.
The following amendments were tabled:
Amendment 1 - Aled Roberts (North
Wales)
Insert as new sub-point 1a) and renumber accordingly:
the growth in the UK’s Gross Domestic Product in 2013;
A vote was taken on Amendment 1:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
46 |
0 |
10 |
56 |
Amendment 1 was agreed.
Amendment 2 - Aled Roberts (North
Wales)
Insert as new sub-point 1a) and renumber accordingly:
that 29.8% of people in Wales are employed in the
public sector, above the 23.5% average for the UK;
A vote was taken on Amendment 2:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
28 |
0 |
29 |
57 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20
the Deputy Presiding Officer exercised his casting vote by voting against the
amendment. Therefore, the amendment was not agreed.
Amendment 3 - William Graham (South Wales East)
Insert as new sub-point at
the end of point 1:
that the UK economy
experienced 0.8% growth in the third quarter of 2013, highlighting the success
of the UK Government’s economic policy.
A vote was taken on Amendment 3:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
18 |
0 |
37 |
55 |
Amendment 3 was not agreed.
Amendment 4 - Aled Roberts (North Wales)
Insert as new sub-point 2a) and renumber accordingly:
that around 200,000 SMEs in Wales are struggling to get
funding, according to the Stage 1 report of the ‘Access to Finance Review’ by
Professor Dylan Jones-Evans.
The ‘Access to Finance Review’ can be accessed at: http://wales.gov.uk/topics/businessandeconomy/publications/accesstofinance/?lang=en
A vote was taken on Amendment 4:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
56 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
Amendment 4 was agreed.
Amendment 5 - William Graham (South Wales East)
Delete sub-point 2b) replace
with:
the failure of the Welsh Government
to use the significant economic levers at its disposal to stimulate growth in
the Welsh economy;A vote was taken on Amendment 5:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
13 |
0 |
43 |
56 |
Amendment 5 was not agreed.
Amendment 6 - William Graham (South
Wales East)
Delete sub-point 2e).
A vote was taken on Amendment 6:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
46 |
0 |
10 |
56 |
Amendment 6 was agreed.
Amendment 7 - William Graham
(South Wales East)
Delete sub-point 3c) and replace with:
to adopt the Welsh Conservative policy to extend small
business rate relief to all businesses with a rateable value of up to £12,000,
and provide tapered relief for those up to £15,000;
A vote was taken on Amendment 7:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
13 |
0 |
43 |
56 |
Amendment 7 was not agreed.
Amendment 8 - Aled Roberts (North
Wales)
Delete sub-point 3c) and replace with:
to extend business rate relief to all businesses with a
rateable value of £15,000 or less and more community facilities such as post
offices, pubs and independent shops; and
A vote was taken on Amendment 8:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
18 |
0 |
38 |
56 |
Amendment 8 was not agreed.
Amendment 9 - Aled Roberts (North
Wales)
Insert as new sub-point 3d) and renumber accordingly:
to enable local authorities to retain a proportion of
the business rates they collect, in order to incentivise local economic
growth;A vote was taken on Amendment 9:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
28 |
0 |
29 |
57 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20
the Deputy Presiding Officer exercised his casting vote by voting against the
amendment. Therefore, the amendment was not agreed.
Amendment 10 - William Graham (South
Wales East)
Delete sub-point 3d) and replace with:
to respond as soon as possible to the Access to Finance
Review Stage 2 report and examine the case for the development of regional
business banks as outlined in ‘Invest Wales’.
The ‘Access to Finance Review Stage 2’ report can be
accessed at:
http://wales.gov.uk/docs/det/publications/131121accesstofund2en.pdf
‘Invest Wales’ can be accessed at: http://www.welshconservatives.com/sites/www.welshconservatives.com/files/invest_wales.pdf
A vote was taken on Amendment 10:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
41 |
0 |
15 |
56 |
Amendment 10 was agreed.
Amendment 11 - William Graham
(South Wales East)
Add as new sub-point at end of point 3:
to explore the possibility of splitting the Welsh
multiplier into small and large businesses which would ensure fairness in the
business rates system and bring Wales in line with England and Scotland.
A vote was taken on Amendment 11:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
56 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
Amendment 11 was agreed.
Amendment 12 - William Graham
(South Wales East)
Add as new sub-point at end of point 3:
to ensure that government policy simplifies our public
sector procurement processes and regulations.
A vote was taken on Amendment 12:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
56 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
Amendment 12 was agreed.
Amendment 13 - Aled Roberts (North
Wales)
Add as new sub-point at end of point 3:
to support smaller businesses and social enterprises
and enable them to grow by unbundling public sector contracts into more
manageable parts, making it easier for these businesses to bid and compete.
A vote was taken on Amendment 13:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
56 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
Amendment 13 was agreed.
Amendment 14 - Aled Roberts (North
Wales)
Add as new sub-point at end of point 3:
to work to increase awareness amongst businesses of
existing opportunities for finance, and listen to the business community on
ways to improve support.
A vote was taken on Amendment 14:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
56 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
Amendment 14 was agreed.
A vote was taken on the
motion as amended:
NDM5379 Elin Jones (Ceredigion)
To propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1. Notes:
a) the growth in the UK’s Gross Domestic Product in 2013;
b) that the estimated funding gap between the demand for
finance from Welsh businesses and the current supply from the banking sector is
£500 million;
c) that non-domestic rates account for a significant
proportion of operating costs for micro and small businesses;
d) that a 1% increase in the rate of public sector
procurement contracts that go to Welsh businesses creates 2,000 new jobs; and
e) that Wales’ natural resources offer significant potential
for economic benefit.
2. Regrets:
a) that around 200,000 SMEs in Wales are struggling to get funding,
according to the Stage 1 report of the ‘Access to Finance Review’ by Professor
Dylan Jones-Evans;
b) that Welsh GVA per capita is the lowest of all UK nations
at 75.2% of the UK;
c) that macro-economic levers remain in the hands of MPs in
the UK Parliament but recognises that the Welsh Government has a significant
role to play in growing the Welsh economy;
d) the absence of up-to-date economic indicators for Wales;
e) the failure of Welsh Government to tackle unemployment and
underemployment; and
3. Calls on the Welsh Government:
a) to publish a comprehensive and long-term plan for growing
the Welsh economy;
b) to impress upon the Office for National Statistics the
need to provide regular and frequent economic indicators for Wales;
c) to adopt the Party of Wales’ policy to extend small
business rate relief to all businesses with a rateable value of £15,000 or
less; and
d) to respond as soon as possible to the Access to Finance
Review Stage 2 report and examine the case for the development of regional
business banks as outlined in ‘Invest Wales’;
e) to explore the possibility of splitting the Welsh
multiplier into small and large businesses which would ensure fairness in the
business rates system and bring Wales in line with England and Scotland;
f) to ensure that government policy simplifies our public
sector procurement processes and regulations;
g) to support smaller businesses and social enterprises and
enable them to grow by unbundling public sector contracts into more manageable
parts, making it easier for these businesses to bid and compete;
h) to work to increase awareness amongst businesses of
existing opportunities for finance, and listen to the business community on
ways to improve support.
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
10 |
0 |
46 |
56 |
The motion as amended was not agreed.
Publication date: 04/12/2013
Date of decision: 04/12/2013
Decided at meeting: 04/12/2013 - Plenary - Fourth Assembly