Decision details
Welsh Conservatives Debate
Decision Maker: Plenary - Fourth Assembly
Status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Purpose:
Debates are one of the
most frequent items of business on the Plenary
agenda. Many types of debate are brought forward in Plenary, including:
- Opposition party debates on a topic of
their choice;
Other than in the case of
Government debates, the time allocated for all other types of debates and their
frequency are determined by the Business
Committee
Decision:
The item started at 15.01
Voting
on the motion and amendments under this item was deferred until Voting Time.
A
vote was taken on the motion without amendment:
NDM5684
Paul Davies (Preseli Pembrokeshire)
To propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1. Notes that there has been no significant
improvement in the number of passengers travelling through Cardiff Airport
since the Welsh Government took ownership of the airport.
2. Calls on the Welsh Government to:
a) provide an update on progress made to develop new
routes from the airport and increase freight operations;
b) publish a current market valuation of Cardiff
Airport; and
c) publish a clear and comprehensive strategy for the
benefit of passengers, businesses and taxpayers which includes proposals for
long-haul routes and explores all options for the future of Cardiff Airport,
including returning the airport to private ownership.
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
11 |
0 |
42 |
53 |
The
motion without amendment was not agreed.
The
following amendments have been tabled:
Amendment
1 - Elin Jones (Ceredigion)
Delete point 1 and replace with:
Notes that future improvement in the number of
passengers travelling through Cardiff Airport will depend upon government
support and sound commercial management
A
vote was taken on Amendment 1:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
37 |
0 |
16 |
53 |
Amendment
1 was agreed.
Amendment
2 – Aled Roberts (North Wales)
Insert as new point 2 and renumber accordingly:
Regrets that the Welsh Government took ownership of
Cardiff Airport without first having produced a full business case for doing
so.
A
vote was taken on Amendment 2:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
16 |
0 |
37 |
53 |
Amendment
2 was not agreed.
Amendment
3 – Aled Roberts (North Wales)
Insert as new point 2 and renumber accordingly:
Calls on the Welsh Government and UK Government to
work together to devolve long-haul air passenger duty to the National Assembly
for Wales.
A
vote was taken on Amendment 3:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
53 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
Amendment
3 was agreed.
Amendment
4 - Elin Jones (Ceredigion)
Delete point 2 and replace with:
Calls on the Welsh government to:
a) publish a clear and comprehensive growth strategy
including proposals for long-haul routes;
b) explore all options for the future of Cardiff
Airport, including both public and private investment models; and
c) secure the devolution of air passenger duty in
order to generate additional routes, increase passenger numbers and boost to
the Welsh economy.
A
vote was taken on Amendment 4:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
15 |
0 |
38 |
53 |
Amendment
4 was not agreed.
A
vote was taken on the motion as amended:
NDM5684
Paul Davies (Preseli Pembrokeshire)
To propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1. Notes that future improvement in the number of
passengers travelling through Cardiff Airport will depend upon government
support and sound commercial management
2. Calls on the Welsh Government and UK Government to
work together to devolve long-haul air passenger duty to the National Assembly
for Wales.
3. Calls on the Welsh Government to:
a) provide an update on progress made to develop new
routes from the airport and increase freight operations;
b) publish a current market valuation of Cardiff
Airport; and
c) publish a clear and comprehensive strategy for the
benefit of passengers, businesses and taxpayers which includes proposals for
long-haul routes and explores all options for the future of Cardiff Airport,
including returning the airport to private ownership.
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
15 |
0 |
38 |
53 |
The
motion as amended was not agreed.
Publication date: 04/02/2015
Date of decision: 04/02/2015
Decided at meeting: 04/02/2015 - Plenary - Fourth Assembly