Decision details
Plaid Cymru Debate
Decision Maker: Plenary - Fourth Assembly
Status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Purpose:
Debates are one of the
most frequent items of business on the Plenary
agenda. Many types of debate are brought forward in Plenary, including:
- Opposition party debates on a topic of
their choice;
Other than in the case of
Government debates, the time allocated for all other types of debates and their
frequency are determined by the Business
Committee
Decision:
The item started at 16.14
Voting on the motion and amendments under this item was deferred until Voting
Time.
NDM5587 Elin Jones (Ceredigion)
To propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1. Believes that congestion on the M4 in the Newport
area is detrimental to the Welsh economy, and that a sustainable and affordable
resolution is required.
2. Affirms that the case has not been made for
proceeding with the 'black route'.
3. Believes that committing the entirety of new
Welsh borrowing powers to one project will limit investment elsewhere.
4. Calls on the Welsh Government to fully consider
the 'blue route' on economic, traffic management, environmental and financial
grounds.
A vote was taken on the
motion without amendment:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
14 |
0 |
36 |
50 |
The
motion without amendment was not agreed.
The following amendments were tabled:
Amendment 1 - Paul Davies (Preseli Pembrokeshire)
Delete all and replace with:
1. Believes that congestion on the M4 in the
Newport area is detrimental to the Welsh economy, and that a sustainable and
affordable resolution is required.
2. Affirms that a transparent case is lacking for
proceeding with the 'black route' and calls on the Minister for Economy,
Science and Transport to publish clear evidence that environmental issues have
been fully considered and an effective due diligence process has taken place.
3. Believes that committing a significant portion
of new Welsh borrowing powers to one project will limit investment elsewhere
and undoubtedly have an effect on other transport schemes across Wales.
4. Calls on the Welsh Government to explain why the
'blue route' was ruled out prematurely and outline what economic, traffic management,
environmental and financial grounds it failed to meet.
A vote was
taken on Amendment 1:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
11 |
0 |
39 |
50 |
Amendment 1 was not
agreed.
Amendment 2 - Jane Hutt (Vale of Glamorgan)
Delete points 2, 3 and 4.
A vote was taken on Amendment 2:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
25 |
0 |
26 |
51 |
As required by Standing Order 6.20 the Presiding
Officer exercised her casting vote by voting against the amendment. Therefore,
the amendment was not agreed.
Amendment 3 - Aled Roberts (North Wales)
Add as new point 3 and renumber accordingly:
Believes investment in public transport and actions
to encourage modal shift away from car use should be a priority as part of a
sustainable, integrated transport plan.
A vote was taken on Amendment 3:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
39 |
0 |
10 |
49 |
Amendment 3 was agreed.
Amendment 4 - Aled Roberts (North Wales)
Insert in point 4 after 'blue route':
as well as suitable public transport solutions
A vote was taken on Amendment 4:
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
14 |
0 |
36 |
50 |
Amendment 4 was not
agreed.
A vote was taken on the
motion as amended:
NDM5587 Elin Jones
(Ceredigion)
To
propose that the National Assembly for Wales:
1.
Believes that congestion on the M4 in the Newport area is detrimental to the
Welsh economy, and that a sustainable and affordable resolution is required.
2.
Affirms that the case has not been made for proceeding with the 'black route'.
3.
Believes investment in public transport and actions to encourage modal
shift away from car use should be a priority as part of a sustainable,
integrated transport plan.
4.
Believes that committing the entirety of new Welsh borrowing powers to one
project will limit investment elsewhere.
5.
Calls on the Welsh Government to fully consider the 'blue route' on economic,
traffic management, environmental and financial grounds.
For |
Abstain |
Against |
Total |
14 |
0 |
36 |
50 |
The
motion as amended was not agreed.
Publication date: 01/10/2014
Date of decision: 01/10/2014
Decided at meeting: 01/10/2014 - Plenary - Fourth Assembly