Meetings
Internal Audit reports
This page gives details of any meetings held which will, or did, discuss the matter, and includes links to the relevant Papers, Agendas and Minutes.
Note: Meeting Agenda can change at short notice. Particularly where future meeting dates are indicated more than a week in advance. Please check before planning to attend a Committee Meeting that the item you are interested in has not been moved.
Meeting: 21/11/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 2
Minutes:
ARAC (22-06) Paper 4 – Official Languages Scheme (OLS)
5.1 The Committee welcomed Mair Parry-Jones and Sarah Dafydd
to the meeting.
5.2 Aled Eirug led the discussion which focussed on
monitoring compliance with the OLS, skills, learning, induction and use of
Welsh across the Senedd Commission and by Members and their support staff.
5.3 In terms of monitoring compliance with the OLS, Sarah
Dafydd described the work to be taken forward by a Task and Finish Group to
strengthen the systems in place. This would include considering how to make
more use of the Welsh language co-ordinators in each service area and linking
with the Welsh Language Commission and the Welsh Government to share ideas and
good practice.
5.4 Sarah also outlined how those wishing to learn Welsh
would capture this in the Personal Development Record (PDR) and the importance
of line managers’ understanding of the time commitment. The OLS team also
worked with service areas and Members and their staff to carry out learning
needs analysis and to identify the best teaching methods to suit the learners.
The Committee noted the supportive approach, as opposed to the use of targets
for learners as everyone’s needs were different and the potential barriers to
progression for more senior staff due to time constraints. They would also be
developing a Cynllun Hyder (Confidence Plan) to encourage Welsh speakers and
learners to use their skills.
5.5 Ken Skates commented on a visible increase in the use of
the Welsh language in the Siambr which was likely to further increase the
numbers using and learning Welsh. Officials noted an increased demand where
Members were pro-actively asking the tutors for help with learning or
refreshing skills.
5.6 Ann Beynon raised a related point around ensuring
non-Welsh speakers or learners were appreciative of working in a bilingual
environment and understanding the Welsh identity and culture. This was covered
through induction and ongoing awareness and monitoring of compliance with the
OLS.
5.7 The Committee then asked for an update on using MS Teams
for bilingual meetings. Arwyn advised that, whilst it was now technically
possible to use the translation functionality on MS Teams, ICT were working
with the Welsh Government to test its effectiveness and reliability. This would
then be tested further for internal meetings before considering its use for
formal business. Arwyn added that the
use of Zoom had become more widespread for bilingual meeting since it had
improved its security features.
5.8 Mair wanted to record her thanks to Sarah Dafydd and her
team for their efforts and progress over recent years and their success in
embedding the OLS as business as usual in the organisation.
5.9 The Committee thanked Gareth for the audit report and Sarah and Mair for their contributions. It was evident that the OLS was in a positive position but welcomed the good practice exercise to be undertaken with the Welsh Language Commission and the Welsh Government.
Meeting: 21/11/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
G&A update report (inc. progress on IA activity)
Minutes:
Oral update
4.1 Gareth Watts provided an oral update on audit and wider
governance activity. This supplemented an update he had shared with Committee
members on 26 October.
4.2 Gareth noted his thanks to Kathryn Hughes and the team
for completing all Governance Matters meetings with each Head of Service and
for updating and issuing templates and
guidance for gathering assurance. The guidance had been enhanced to make it
more explicit around capturing corporate assurances. The process had also been
adapted to take on board emerging best practice from a “golden thread” project
being led by HM Treasury and the Government Internal Audit Agency. The
Committee noted that the project had not raised any learning points for the
Commission and had provided further assurance that best practice was followed.
It was also noted that the Commission’s approach was shared with other
organisations, and how this might inform best practice for the government
project.
4.3 Gareth also provided updates to the Committee on other
activity as follows:
a. he and his team had completed
a desktop exercise to inform an effectiveness review of Executive Board and
Leadership Team which would be discussed with its members in the coming weeks;
b. he had completed an
effectiveness review of the Independent Remuneration Board and had shared his
draft report with Siwan Davies and Anna Daniel before discussing it with the
Chair;
c. he had recently attended a
CIPFA Cymru conference which had covered global and UK-wide risks, noting that
cyber no longer featured in the top ten risks - he offered to share his notes
and slides with Committee members;
d. the Commission’s co-sourced
internal audit partner contract had been awarded to Haines Watts for the next
four years (for the past eight years this service had been carried out by
TIAA), and they had completed their first audit on Key Financial Controls, the
report on which Gareth hoped to circulate before Christmas; and
e. he had completed his audit of
Members’ expenses, with no recommendations and he would work with the Members’
Business Support team on future taxation implications for Members.
4.4 Gareth added that he had been discussing the scope of an advisory review to be carried out by Haines Watts on Business Continuity, using their expertise and extensive knowledge of this area. The Cyber-security assurance audit would also be carried out by Haines Watts, the report on which would be circulated out of committee. He also referred to the work he was due to undertake around assurance relating to the Regulatory Framework risks.
Meeting: 15/06/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
G&A update report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 7
Minutes:
ARAC (22-03) Paper 3 – Governance & Assurance Update
Report - June 2022
3.1 Gareth Watts presented his update on overall governance
and assurance activity. He had circulated the follow-up report on previous
cyber-security audits out of committee and thanked Committee members for their
questions which he had passed on to relevant officials for response. He planned
to share the reports on the most recent cyber-security audit and the audit of
compliance with the Official Languages Scheme in the coming weeks.
3.2 Gareth confirmed that the tendering exercise for the
internal audit co-sourced partner was on-going. He was pleased to report
evidence from the supplier presentations of audit experience in the Welsh
public sector. The new contract was due to take effect from 1 August 2022.
3.3 The Committee questioned the ways in which the number of contracts awarded to Welsh suppliers were measured and reported. Gareth would be working with the Head of Procurement to discuss how this might incorporate the Welsh economic impact of suppliers as opposed to presence in Wales.
Meeting: 29/04/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 8)
Latest Internal Audit report(s)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 10
Minutes:
ARAC (22-02) Paper 7 – Winding up of Members' Offices
8.1 Gareth presented his internal audit report. This audit
aimed to assess the procedures and controls in place around the dissolution of
the Senedd for the 2021 election with particular focus on those Members of the
Senedd that were standing down or not returned at the election. It also covered
additional challenges caused by the pandemic on the dispersal of assets. Gareth
recorded his thanks to the Members’ Business Support and ICT teams for their
co-operation during the audit.
8.2 The review examined the guidance, process, and
procedures in place during the dissolution period and drew out the significant
issues identified, or lessons learned. Although no formal recommendations were
raised, Gareth identified a number of issues which the Commission may wish to
consider for future elections.
8.3 The Committee noted and welcomed the detailed report and were impressed with the thoroughness of the review. Committee members recorded their praise for Gareth and the teams involved, acknowledged the amount of work carried out in a short space of time, and appreciated the sensitivities involved. They further remarked that it was evident that the internal controls, as well as the positive internal audit culture, were working well.
Meeting: 29/04/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Internal Audit Annual Report and Opinion
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 13
Minutes:
ARAC (22-02) Paper 5 – Internal Audit Annual Report and
Opinion for 2021-22
6.1 Gareth introduced his Annual Report and Opinion which reported that the
Accounting Officer could take moderate assurance that arrangements to secure
governance, risk management and internal control, were suitably designed and
applied effectively. This was a reflection on the culture of the organisation
and the positive management response to internal audit recommendations.
6.2 The Committee noted Gareth’s Annual Report and Opinion and commented that the moderate opinion provided a good level of assurance.
Meeting: 29/04/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Charter and Internal Audit's compliance with Public Sector Internal Audit Standard (PSIAS)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 16
- Restricted enclosure 17
Minutes:
ARAC (22-02) Paper 4
– Internal Audit Charter cover paper
ARAC (22-02) Paper 4 – Annex A – Internal Audit Charter
2022
5.1 The Committee formally approved the Internal Audit Charter for 2022-23, noting that there were no substantive changes to report.
Meeting: 29/04/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
G&A update report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 20
Minutes:
Internal Audit
ARAC (22-02) Paper 3 – G&A update report
4.1 Gareth Watts provided an update on overall governance and
assurance activity since the last ARAC meeting and highlighted the following
from his report:
- Assurance
statements had been finalised, reviewed by the Chief Executive and challenged
by Independent Advisers at a meeting on 10 March. This had informed drafting of
the Governance Statement which was included in the papers for this meeting.
- The Commission’s Corporate Delivery Plan was approved by the Executive Board
on 22 April and would be shared with the Commission as a paper to note on 9
May. Gareth and Ed would now work on corporate communications to ensure
visibility of the plan across the organisation.
- All service areas had carried out a Business Impact Analysis and this was
informing ongoing work to update the Commission’s approach to business
continuity.
- At the latest regular meeting with the Independent Remuneration Board’s
clerking team, Gareth had been asked to carry out a mid-term effectiveness
review.
4.6 Gareth provided an update on the core internal audit
work. The report on the audit of Winding up of Members’ Offices was covered
under item 8. The cyber-security audit and value for money review of Library
Services had also been completed, reports on which would be shared as soon as
they had been finalised and approved by the relevant Directors. The Committee
were reminded that Ann Beynon and Aled Eirug had reviewed an outline terms of
reference for the Official Languages Scheme audit, work on which was also well
advanced. A follow up report on implementation of recommendations from the
previous cyber-security audit, all of which were progressing, would also be
shared with the Committee.
4.7 The Committee praised Gareth for his achievements in ensuring that the audit programme was in such a good position, particularly during the pandemic. Gareth thanked the Committee members for their positive comments. In response to questions around his capacity to undertake such a substantive programme alongside his other assurance responsibilities, Gareth provided assurance that this was manageable with support from his colleague Victoria Paris and his current internal audit co-sourced partner TIAA.
Meeting: 29/04/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 7)
Annual Report on Fraud
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 23
Minutes:
ARAC (22-02) Paper 6 – Annual Report Fraud
7.1 Gareth reported that during 2021-22, there had been no
cases brought to his attention of actual or suspected fraudulent activity
regarding cash, allowances and expenses or theft of assets.
7.2 He described how information shared regularly by TIAA
and Audit Wales on fraudulent activity across the public and private sectors
helped ensure the Commission remained alert to the tactics being deployed by
potential fraudsters.
7.3 The Committee were pleased that no fraudulent activity
had been detected during 2021-22. In response to questions about benchmarking
against other public sector organisations, Gareth explained that we were not as
exposed in the same way as some grant paying organisations, for example. He
added that the majority of spend was via payroll and Members’ pay and
allowances which had robust controls in place, with staff in those areas carrying
out due diligence. Going forward, Gareth would also be exploring assurances
around the use of procurement cards.
7.4 The Committee noted and thanked Gareth for his Annual Report on Fraud.
Meeting: 14/02/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Plan 2022-23
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 26
Minutes:
ARAC (22-01) Paper 4 – IA plan 2022-23
5.1 Gareth presented his draft audit plan for 2022-23 and
highlighted key items to the Committee.
The Chair welcomed the audit plan and reminded the Committee that he had
regular meetings with Gareth to discuss progress. He also accepted Gareth’s assurances on the
resources in place to deliver the plan, including use of the co-sourced
partner. He also welcomed a return to a
more regular programme of audit work, following a turbulent couple of
years.
5.2 In response to questions from the Committee, Gareth explained how the Commission used TIAA, as the co-sourced internal audit partners, to carry out some of the more generic audits, and also some of a more technical nature where they had specific expertise, for example ICT. He also described the value TIAA added in terms of their wider public sector work. He offered to provide further details to Committee members on the audits to be carried out by TIAA. He also advised that the contract with TIAA was due end on 31 July 2022 and the tendering process would commence in late spring to early summer.
Action
·
Gareth
Watts to share details of internal audits to be carried out by TIAA.
Meeting: 14/02/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 29
Minutes:
ARAC (22-01) Paper 5 - Members' Expenses 2021
6.1 Gareth introduced the Members’ Expenses audit
report. The report outlined the work
undertaken on Members’ expenses for the financial year 2020-21 and the
additional work undertaken on the payments related to the Senedd Election of
May 2021. No recommendations were raised
and an overall assurance rating of substantial was given.
6.2 Gareth confirmed that the Members’ Business Support
(MBS) team had a good level of knowledge and understanding of the processes and
systems in place, and the rules relating to the Independent Remuneration
Board’s Determination. The audit
demonstrated a robust control framework and found that there was effective
segregation of duties across the team to ensure all claims were checked by a
separate processor and authoriser.
6.3 Prior to the audit process, MBS had discovered an issue
relating to HMRC rules around
qualification for tax free amounts for Resettlement Grant payments. In two cases, the calculation of the payment
had been completed correctly, but the appropriate tax elements had not gone
through the system. MBS were aware of
how this issue had arisen and were taking corrective action and putting
safeguards in place to avert a repeat occurrence at future elections.
6.4 Gareth also commented on his involvement with the
project to replace the payroll system and the intention of incorporating an
expenses module to the system requirements.
6.5 In response to a question from Aled around the
relationship with the Independent Remuneration Board, Gareth advised of his
regular meetings with the Board’s clerking team to discuss communication and
engagement.
6.6 The Committee also noted that Gareth was finalising the
Asset Management report and had engaged with outgoing Members as well as
internal services areas such as ICT, MBS and Estates and Facilities.
6.7 The Chair thanked Gareth for the report and was encouraged by the findings in what was an important part of the assurance process. He also gave credit to all involved in the audit, and for the discretion shown, particularly given some of the sensitivities.
Meeting: 14/02/2022 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
G&A update report (inc. progress on Internal Audit activity)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 32
Minutes:
ARAC (22-01) Paper 3 – G&A update report
4.1 Gareth Watts provided an update on overall governance
and assurance activity. Service level assurance statements had been finalised
and the Directors had submitted their statements to the Chief Executive and
Clerk for review. The usual challenge
session, to be attended by the Chair and one other Committee member to provide
independent scrutiny of the process and Director statements, was scheduled for
10 March.
4.2 Gareth had recently shared details of the Commission’s
approach to Assurance Mapping and gathering service level assurances with his
counterparts in both the Scottish Parliament and House of Lords. He had been
invited to present to their audit committees in the future.
4.3 The team was also leading on a review of the
Commission’s approach to business continuity, with Business Impact Assessments
completed for services across the Commission.
Gareth was also undertaking a review of the Commission’s approach to
Service Planning and presented his findings, proposals and next steps later in
the meeting.
4.4 Gareth updated the Committee on scoping and progress
with current audits, including cyber-security and library services. He had also held an initial scoping meeting
with colleagues responsible for the Official Languages Scheme and, as
previously agreed, would share the scope of this audit with the Committee.
4.5 The Committee questioned if any data was collected on the use of the Welsh language by Members of the Senedd in plenary and Senedd committee meetings. Gareth confirmed that the Translation and Reporting Service logged this data, and that this, along with the impact of the pandemic on delivery of Welsh learning packages, would be captured in the review.
Meeting: 22/11/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Review HMT/other guidance for Audit and Risk Assurance Committees
Oral item
Minutes:
Oral update
6.1 Gareth
Watts and the Chair confirmed that there had been no updates to the HMT Audit
and Risk Assurance Committee handbook. Gareth and Kathryn had attended a CIPFA Better
Governance Forum webinar which was introducing updated guidance for police and
local authority audit committees but Gareth noted that there was little of
relevance to the Commission. Kathryn would continue to share any relevant
articles from the Better Governance Forum and other bodies such as the National
Audit Office.
6.2 Gareth updated the Committee on the new functional standards which applied to all UK Government departments to promote consistency. He reminded the Committee that the Commission was not compelled to apply the standards but he would work with his counterparts in other organisations and colleagues across the Commission to determine what (if any) best practice could be adopted. The Chair was encouraged by the Commission’s approach to this guidance and saw it as something to take advantage of.
Meeting: 22/11/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Consider latest Internal Audit reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 37
Minutes:
5.1 Gareth
introduced the Payroll audit report explaining that, as this was one of the
Commission’s most material financial system, he undertook a review every 2-3 years.
As restrictions allowed, he had been able to meet face to face with Payroll
colleagues to walk through the system. The review had resulted in a moderate
assurance rating with five recommendations. The main areas identified for
improvement were around updating policies and resilience within the team.
Progress on these recommendations would be revisited in March and details would
be captured in his Annual Report and Opinion, due for consideration at the
April meeting.
5.2 In
response to questions from the Committee around benchmarking payroll capability
against best practice, Gareth confirmed that the Commission had been accredited
with a Better Payroll award in 2018, and would seek an update from HR on
any future plans to renew this accreditation.
5.3
In response to questions
around the monitoring of leave and flexible working hours, Gareth confirmed
that a separate system was used for these as well as Personal Development
Reports. He added that HR had recently implemented a Microsoft forms system to
capture monthly credit/debit flexi balances, which would prove extremely useful
management information for the Finance team at year end.
5.4 The Chair
was content with the detailed report and welcomed an update on the
recommendations in due course.
Action: Share details of current accreditation of the payroll function with ARAC and discuss with HR plans for future benchmarking/accreditation
Meeting: 22/11/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Governance and Assurance update (inc. progress of Internal Audit activity)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 40
Minutes:
ARAC
(05-21) Paper 3 – G&A update report
4.1
Gareth
Watts provided an update on overall governance and assurance activity which he and
his team were undertaking. This included early preparation for this year’s
Governance Statement. Kathryn Hughes had met with all Heads of Service as part
of the annual series of ‘governance matters’ meetings which had provided an
opportunity to review their statements from the previous year and discuss the
process for this year. She had then commissioned draft Assurance Statements
which were due to be reviewed by Directors in December.
4.2
Gareth
also outlined the reviews he and his team were undertaking around: the
Commission’s approach to corporate and service planning; performance
management, including the Key Performance Indicators; and business continuity
plans. In response to questions about the role of Leadership Team in relation
to risk management, Gareth explained that formalisation of their input,
particularly around the escalation of risks was being considered following a
review of its terms of reference.
4.3
Gareth
then provided an update on progress against his internal audit programme. As
well as completing the review of the Commission’s payroll arrangements (see
item 5), the work he had been carrying out with the Members Business Support
Team to test the payment of resettlement grants and redundancy to departing
Members and their support staff was substantially complete. Further work on the
winding up of Members’ offices including a review of the return of ICT assets
and disposal of other assets was ongoing and this would involve engaging with
outgoing Members. He hoped to be in a position to circulate his reports in
advance of the next meeting.
4.4
Gareth
advised that the scopes for the audits of cyber security and the value for
money review on Library Services had been developed and that fieldwork for
these would commence in December/January.
4.5
Aled
Eirug asked if the issue of archiving of tapes could be included in the scope
of the Library Services audit. In response, Dave informed the Committee of
on-going discussions with the National Library of Wales around their capability
to digitally transfer data stored on tapes into long term media, to ensure an
accessible and long term preservation of records.
Meeting: 18/06/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
G&A update report (including a review of progress on implementing recommendations and actions arising from previous reports)
Oral update
Minutes:
Oral
item
3.1 Gareth Watts provided an oral update
on progress against outstanding audit work. Fieldwork for the audit of
Members’ expenses had been completed and used by Audit Wales as part of their
audit of the Commission’s accounts. He would circulate a report to the
Committee once completed. He would also be working on a wider asset management
review as well as an audit to provide assurances required by the Chief
Executive as Accounting Officer relating to the Welsh Consolidated Fund. He had
also agreed with the Chair that he would present an update on the
implementation of audit recommendations to the Committee at its July meeting.
3.2 The Chair invited Gareth Watts to
outline his assurances in relation to the Annual Report and Accounts. He confirmed the moderate level of assurance
on governance, risk management and internal audit provided in his Annual Report
and Opinion in April. He confirmed he was content from an internal audit
perspective that the accounts could be signed.
Meeting: 23/04/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 8)
Latest Internal Audit reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 45
- Restricted enclosure 46
Minutes:
ARAC (02-21) Paper
7 – ICT Asset Management
ARAC (02-21) Paper
8 – Cyber Security
9.1
Gareth
introduced the ICT Asset Management internal audit report. The main focus of
the review had been on the management of portable media devices which had been
identified by ICT as an area of potential risk, particularly given the new ways
of working. A rating of substantial assurance was given with two
recommendations accepted by the ICT team. Gareth outlined further work to
enhance the use of management information and reviewing process with new
Members and their staff which would take place during the year.
9.2
In
response to questions around the safe and sustainable disposal of assets,
Gareth advised that he had sought and received assurances from the Commission’s
Sustainability Manager, and the Estates and Facilities Management and ICT teams
on the effectiveness of arrangements with a local third-party supplier.
9.3
Gareth
introduced the Cyber Security audit report produced by TIAA. He explained that
an audit of this high risk area was undertaken annually, the scope of which was
based on discussions about areas of focus with the Head of ICT. The focus for
this year was around back up and recovery arrangements which included
comparisons with best practice guidance provided by the National Cyber Security
Centre (NCSC).
9.4
The
review concluded that the Commission had made considerable progress in
implementing a new backup process which provided significant improvements over
the previous solution. The overall rating of moderate assurance was given with
six recommendations accepted by management. The Committee welcomed the
thoroughness of the report.
9.5
In
response to questions from Committee members, Mark Neilson confirmed assurances
around the security of the network, the tight security around off-site servers,
and arrangements for business continuity and disaster recovery and back ups,
including for legacy back-up tapes. This included assurance for the management
of risks around malware and for resolving issues outside normal working hours.
He also noted added resilience through membership of a wider public sector
arrangement and agreed to invite a representative to attend a future meeting.
9.6
The
Committee thanked Mark for the additional assurances and noted that, whilst
assurance levels were not as high as anticipated they were pleased with the
management responses. They appreciated that ICT infrastructure was under
constant threat and were thankful for all the efforts by Mark and his team to
manage cyber security risks. The Committee would welcome future updates on the
implementation of the back-up solution.
Meeting: 23/04/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 7)
Annual Report on Fraud
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 49
Minutes:
ARAC (02-21) Paper
6 – Annual Report Fraud
8.1
Gareth
introduced his Annual Report on Fraud to the Committee. The provision of
assurances and details of training and awareness around fraud had been covered
under agenda item 5.
8.2
The
Committee noted the recent case whereby internal controls and monitoring of
Members’ spend had detected the theft of Commission assets which resulted in
investigation by the appropriate authorities. Arwyn described how controls
around the stationery ordering process for Members’ offices had been further
tightened to prevent this from occurring in the future. He added that the
enhanced controls provided greater oversight by the Remuneration Board and
greater transparency.
8.3
The
Chair thanked Gareth for the update and the Committee noted the report.
Meeting: 23/04/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Internal Audit Annual Report and Opinion
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 52
Minutes:
ARAC (02-21) Paper
5 – Internal Audit Annual Report and Opinion for 2020-21
7.1
Gareth
introduced his paper which provided an overview of the work undertaken by the Internal
Audit service for the year ended 31 March 2021. The Committee noted that some
planned audits had been delayed due to
Covid-19 but welcomed the additional real-time assurance work undertaken. This
had included reports to reflect on the Commission’s response to the Covid-19
pandemic and a review of the Commission’s risk and issue management during the
pandemic.
7.2
The
Committee welcomed the Commission’s continued positive attitude to the
implementation of audit recommendations which reflected well on organisational
culture.
7.3
The
Chair thanked Gareth for his update, noting recognition for the volume of work
covered and assurances provided on the controls in place.
7.4
Responding
to questions around the overall moderate assurance rating in his Annual Report,
Gareth judged this to be a fair assessment in light of the audits conducted,
some of which were rated as substantial assurance but with others being delayed
due to the challenging circumstances.
Meeting: 23/04/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Charter and Internal Audit's compliance with Public Sector Internal Audit Standard (PSIAS)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 55
- Restricted enclosure 56
Minutes:
ARAC (02-21) Paper 4 – IA Charter
cover paper
ARAC (02-21) Paper
4 – Annex A - IA Charter 2021
6.1
Gareth
presented his paper, highlighting that the Senedd Commission’s Internal Audit
service generally conforms with Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS).
In line with PSIAS requirements, the Committee was asked to formally approve
the Commission’s Internal Audit Charter. Gareth confirmed that his annual
review of the Charter had not resulted in any substantive changes.
6.2
Responding
to questions around the detection of fraud and appropriate training, Gareth and
Nia explained their collaborative approach to providing assurances to Manon, as
the Accounting Officer on the controls in place. The Committee were reminded of
the training and ongoing awareness activities for appropriate officials,
including members of the Finance team and the finance co-ordinators in each
service area. Mark Neilson added that general cyber security awareness training
for staff, which covered fraud detection, was also delivered throughout the
year. Audit Wales also reminded the Committee of its own good practice guidance
on fraud and outlined a recent case study where fraudsters were hijacking
supplier emails. Gareth offered to share the various fraud guidance documents
with Committee members.
6.3
The
Chair indicated that a shared responsibility approach was common practice in
public sector bodies but urged a continued focus on this going forward.
6.4
The
Committee thanked Gareth for the update and approved the Internal Audit Charter
for 2021.
Meeting: 23/04/2021 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
G&A update report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 59
Minutes:
ARAC
(02-21) Paper 3 – G&A update report
5.1
Gareth
presented his update report on governance and audit work, highlighting priority
work with further updates to follow in due course.
5.2
Despite
the disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, Gareth was pleased that the
reports on the Commission’s ICT asset management and cyber security had been
completed and were included in the papers for this meeting.
5.3
The
fieldwork for the audit of Members’ expenses had also been completed and a
draft report shared with the Members’ Business Support team. Gareth highlighted
that this was the first year the audit had been completed remotely and with
electronic records and, given its success, would be repeated for future audits.
In response to a suggestion from Suzy, Gareth agreed to consider ways to seek
input from Members for future expense’s audits, to help aid their understanding
of the process.
Meeting: 20/11/2020 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Review HMT/other guidance for Audit and Risk Assurance Committees (Chair and Head of Internal Audit)
Minutes:
Oral update
5.1 The Chair and Gareth Watts confirmed that there had been no changes to HM Treasury’s Audit and Risk Assurance Committee Handbook since March 2016. The Chair felt it may be useful to share the roles and responsibilities section of HM Treasury’s Management of Risk – A Strategic Overview ‘Orange Book’ with Committee members.
5.2 Gareth shared an update from the Institute of Internal Auditors on the ‘Three Lines of Defence’ model for assurance frameworks. The use of the word “defence” had been dropped in order to include a focus on the role of risk management in taking risk-based decisions around opportunities, as well as matters of defence. The new model emphasised the importance of communication across each line of assurance for which Gareth felt the Commission had a mature approach.
5.3 There was also some additional guidance on risk appetite which the Commission would consider. Whilst recognising it was for the Commission to determine its risk appetite, the Chair asked for this to be discussed at a future meeting in terms of how this would be presented to the new Commission after the May 2021 Senedd Elections.
Actions
· (5.1) Share the roles and responsibilities section of HM Treasury’s Management of Risk – A Strategic Overview ‘Orange Book’.
· (5.3) Add risk appetite to the agenda for a future meeting to consider how this will be presented to the new Com
Meeting: 20/11/2020 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Governance and Assurance Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 64
Minutes:
ARAC (05-20) Paper 3 –
Governance and Assurance update report
4.1
Gareth Watts presented his Governance and
Assurance update report. He had participated in a Heads of Internal Audit Forum
with his counterparts from across the Welsh public sector where discussion had
focussed on differing approaches to giving assurances during Covid-19 and the
effect this had on internal audit plans. Core internal audit reviews had given
way to more advisory pieces of work and a focus on the challenges of
maintaining effective governance and assurance arrangements. It was noted that
most core internal audit reports would be delivered in the final quarter.
4.2
Preparations for gathering assurances to inform
the annual Governance Statement for 2020-21 were now well advanced. Gareth
thanked his team for meeting with each Head of Service to discuss governance
matters and ensuring they were fully prepared for drafting their Assurance
Statements. A subsequent meeting had been held with the three Directors and a
commissioning email had been sent to Heads of Service. The templates and
guidance for the statements had been adapted to emphasise the focus on the
impact of Covid-19. Directors would draft their statements by early January and
an update on progress would be provided at the February 2021 meeting.
4.3
Gareth confirmed he had continued to comply with
internal auditing standards and that work on the 2020-21 internal audit
programme was on-going. The audits on risk and issues management and asset
management were nearing completion and reports would be circulated out of committee
when finalised. Gareth was confident that he would complete the agreed audit
plan by April 2021 noting that, as with other organisations most of the reports
would be delivered in the last quarter. He outlined that his key areas of focus
in the coming months would include cyber security and scoping the audit on
compliance culture.
4.4
In relation to the audit on compliance culture,
Committee members were encouraged by the meta compliance tool that had been
used to monitor the acceptance of the updated ICT Security Rules. Committee
members asked about extending the use of compliance tools to Members of the
Senedd and their staff. In response, Gareth advised that, as the Commission
provided only an advisory service to Members in relation to policies and procedures
this would not be possible to enforce. He also clarified that the compliance
audit was in relation to Commission staff only.
4.5
Gareth informed the Committee that, at the
request of the Chief Executive and Clerk, he was also undertaking an additional
piece of work on reviewing the revised set of Key Performance Indicators in
order for the Commission to give assurances to the Public Accounts Committee
(PAC) that they remained robust and fit for purpose. He envisaged completing
this work by February 2021.
4.6 Related to the audit of asset management, Committee members questioned the guidance issued to Members around dissolution, in particular the value of assets to be written off. Dave confirmed that the detailed guidance was yet to be agreed ... view the full minutes text for item 4
Meeting: 20/01/2020 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Consider the proposed Internal Audit strategy
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 67
Minutes:
ACARAC (01-20)
Paper 4 - Internal Audit Plan 2020-21
4.1
Gareth outlined the Internal Audit Plan for 2020-21
noting that audits carried out during 2019-20 had assisted with the
identification of areas to cover. Gareth welcomed further suggestions from the
Committee.
4.2
Gareth outlined the upcoming review of the
arrangements in place for the recording, safeguarding and protection of the
Commission’s tangible assets. He also
outlined that the audit into risk management was a periodic review of the
effectiveness of risk management arrangements at a corporate, service and
project level.
4.3
The Committee were keen to hear further information
relating to the planned audit of compliance culture, due to take place in
November 2020. Gareth explained that this was a follow up to previous specific
audit work to provide wider assurance on compliance in general. It would
involve identifying key areas of statutory, policy and process requirements for
the audit to ascertain how compliance was measured and levels of confidence in
measures.
4.4
The Chair thanked Gareth for his work in producing
the Internal Audit Plan and providing Committee members with an update.
Action: (4.3) Gareth Watts to share the scope for the compliance culture audit.
Meeting: 21/10/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Review HMT/other guidance for Audit and Risk Assurance Committees (Chair and Head of Internal Audit)
Minutes:
6.1 Gareth
advised that there had been no updates to HM Treasury’s Risk and Assurance
Committee Handbook.
6.2 Kathryn
had circulated an updated version of HM Treasury’s Orange Book on Risk Management to
Committee members in advance of the meeting. Gareth noted that, at a recent Heads of Internal Audit Forum he
had discovered this was subject to change as it was currently out for
consultation, with a hard launch due in early 2020. He would be working with
his counterparts on a consultation response but confirmed that there was
nothing that would impact on the Committee’s Terms of Reference.
6.3 The
Committee were informed that results of a consultation by the Institute of
Internal Auditors (IIA) on the three lines of defence model for assurance
frameworks were due to be published in December. Gareth would be considering
this, along with a new IIA guide for internal audits in the financial services
sector to assess any impact for the Commission’s approaches.
Meeting: 21/10/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Consider latest Internal Audit reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 72
Minutes:
ACARAC (05-19) Paper 4 – Absence Management
5.1
The Chair invited Gareth
and Lowri Williams, Head of HR, to introduce the internal audit report on Absence
Management. Gareth explained that the audit had concluded that the fundamental
controls and mechanisms were in place and working and included a small number
of relatively minor recommendations. Lowri described how HR were working with
the Leadership Team and service areas to ensure sufficient awareness of support
available to staff through the policies and procedures in place and that these
were being used effectively.
5.2
Committee members and
officials discussed various aspects of the report including the use of absence
data. This included a discussion around the usefulness of benchmarking absence
rates against other Civil Service/public sector organisations and whether there
was scope to benchmark against other legislatures. Hugh encouraged officials to
continue to monitor absence data particularly when there was continued pressure
on staff resources.
5.3
The Chair thanked Gareth
and Lowri for presenting and discussing the details of the report with the
Committee which they collectively agreed was a positive reflection of the
controls in place, with a recognition of some that could be strengthened. He
asked to receive an update on the implementation of the recommendations early
in 2020.
Action: Provide an update on the implementation of recommendations from the review of Absence Management
Meeting: 17/06/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Latest Internal Audit Report/Previously circulated Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 75
- Restricted enclosure 76
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-19) Paper 6 – Cyber-security 2019
ACARAC (03-19) Paper 7 – Assembly Members’ Expenses 2019
6.1
The Committee agreed to consider the cyber-security
audit report under item 9 together with the corporate risk.
6.2
Gareth introduced the report on Assembly Members’
Expenses and invited comments from Committee members. All previous
recommendations had been implemented and there was one minor recommendation in
this year’s report. Gareth assured the Committee that his findings showed
further evidence of improved communication between Assembly Members and Members’ Business Support in relation
to their allowances.
6.3
Suzy asked whether,
during the course of the audit, any issues had come to Gareth’s attention
around the recent Remuneration Board recommendation relating to Assembly
Members buying their own equipment. Gareth indicated that there was currently
good guidance in place in terms of asset management but would provide further
assurance on this issue for next year’s audit.
6.4
The Chair was pleased
with the findings of the reports and had been reassured to note that no major
issues were identified.
Meeting: 17/06/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Annual Report on Fraud
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 79
Minutes:
ACARAC (03-19) Paper 5 – Annual Report on
Fraud 2019
5.1
Gareth presented the
Annual Report on Fraud. Committee members were content with the assurance provided
by the report. They were pleased that Gareth and Nia had continued to be in
regular contact with officials from the Wales Audit Office and the Government’s Internal
Audit Agency, receiving the latest information on current scams and
fraudulent activity across the UK.
5.2
Suzy noted that in relation to the
internal audit on Assembly Member expenses, Members were
being challenged consistently on their expenditure by Members’ Business
Support. The Committee noted that controls were tight and that rules and
procedures appeared well understood.
5.3
The Chair acknowledged
the difficulty some public sector organisations have in managing fraud as a
risk but had been pleased to see the assurance provided by the report.
Meeting: 17/06/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Internal Audit Annual Report 2018-19
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 82
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-19) Paper 4 – Internal Audit Annual Opinions and Report 2019
4.1
The Committee considered and noted the Internal
Audit Opinion and Report presented by Gareth. They were pleased to be updated
on Victoria Paris’ progress towards her Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) qualification
which would help provide further audit resilience within the Commission.
4.2
Gareth confirmed that the level of assurance had
not changed since the previous year but was now described as “Moderate” to
bring it into line with the Government Internal Audit Agency (GIAA) model of
assurance.
Meeting: 17/06/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Governance & Assurance Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 85
Minutes:
ACARAC (03-19) Paper 3 – Governance & Assurance
Update Report June 2019
3.1
Gareth Watts presented
his report which provided the Committee with an update on internal audit and other
activities undertaken by him and his team. He advised that the 2018-19 audit
plan had been completed, highlighted the positive responses from management and
that any outstanding recommendations would be followed up throughout the year.
The Committee asked to return to the implications for Assembly Commission
governance arising from proposals relating to Electoral Commission at a future
meeting.
3.2
In response to questions
from Committee members, Gareth advised that there were no unmanageable risks
posed by delaying production of data processing agreements between the Assembly
Commission and Members until after the 2021 Election. This would also provide
the best opportunity to capture the new cohort of Members. Gareth
assured Committee members that this was
in line with other UK parliaments.
Actions
·
Implications for the
Commission arising from proposals relating to the Electoral Commission to be
added to the forward work programme.
Meeting: 25/03/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Charter and Internal Audit's Compliance with Public Sector Internal Audit Standard (PSIAS)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 88
- Restricted enclosure 89
Minutes:
ACARAC (02-19) Paper 5 – Internal Audit Charter
3.10
Gareth advised that there
had been no updates to the Internal Audit Charter or the Public Sector Internal
Audit Standards (PSIAS). He also confirmed
continued compliance with PSIAS and that the next External Quality Assessment
(EQA) was due by April 2022.
Meeting: 25/03/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Internal Audit Plan 2019-20
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 92
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-19) Paper 4 – Internal Audit Plan 2019-20
3.1
Due to this meeting being so soon after the February
meeting, there were no internal audit reports to present. Any reports approved before the June meeting would
be shared with the Committee in advance.
3.2
Gareth confirmed that he was covering the role of
designated Data Protection Officer for the Commission and explained the
arrangement that had been put in place with the office of the Public Services
Ombudsman for Wales to provide cover for the data protection and GDPR function
during a period of maternity leave.
3.3
Gareth had also been involved in discussions with
the Electoral Commission around proposed changes to governance arrangements
contained in the Senedd and Elections (Wales) Bill. He agreed to provide a note of potential
implications for the Assembly Commission when more information was available.
3.4
In relation to the review of procurement, Committee
members discussed how the Commission could better engage with small Welsh
suppliers. One member of the Committee
advised of attendance at a meeting with the local Chambers of Commerce where
this issue had been discussed. Dave Tosh
agreed to discuss with Ann Beynon and Jan Koziel (Head of Procurement) options
to engage with relevant organisations to inform the Commission’s procurement
strategy to better understand supply chain barriers to engaging with the public
sector.
3.5
The Committee questioned the focus of audit work on
the Business Directorate. Gareth and Siwan
Davies had discussed the timing of future audits and the scope of that work,
but Siwan was in the process of appointing a Head of Committee Service, who
would be responsible for leading this work.
3.6
The Chair welcomed the opportunity to be involved in
discussions with Gareth and Siwan on the terms of reference for the end to end
Committee review.
3.7
Gareth thanked the Committee for their comments and
was happy to receive further suggestions about his audit plan by email. He agreed to share the review of the
Leadership Team and Executive Board with the Chair and was happy to re-schedule
the sickness absence review to ensure a report was approved in time for the
autumn Public Accounts Committee (PAC) scrutiny session.
3.8
Gareth confirmed that his annual report, to be
presented in June, would capture any outstanding recommendations.
Actions
–
(3.4) Gareth to provide a note of
potential implications for Assembly Commission governance arrangements arising
from proposals relating to the Electoral Commission contained in the Senedd and
Elections (Wales) Bill.
–
(3.5) Dave to discuss
with Ann Beynon and Jan Koziel options to engage with relevant organisations to
inform the Commission’s procurement strategy to better understand supply chain
barriers.
–
(3.6) Gareth and Siwan to
engage in discussions with Bob on plans for assurance reviews within the
Assembly Business Directorate.
–
(3.8) Committee members
to provide comments to Gareth on the 2019-20 Internal Audit Plan.
–
(3.8) Gareth to share his
report on the review of Leadership Team and Executive Board with Chair when
available.
- (3.8) ... view the full minutes text for item 4
Meeting: 25/03/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 95
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-19) Paper 3 – update report
3.1
Gareth
Watts presented his update report which provided the Committee with a flavour
of his activities above and beyond internal audit work.
Meeting: 11/02/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
TIAA internal audit partner and latest Internal Audit reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 98
- Restricted enclosure 99
- Restricted enclosure 100
Minutes:
Oral
item - TIAA internal audit partner
4.1 The
Committee welcomed Clive Fitzgerald from TIAA, the Commission’s co-sourced
internal audit partner, to the meeting. For the benefit of the new Committee
members, Clive provided some background to the company, which was the largest
independent provider of internal audit, business assurance and counter-fraud in
the country, covering a wide range of public sector organisations. Gareth
described how the co-sourced arrangement works in practice, bringing in specific
expertise and knowledge and protecting the independence of the internal audit
function.
ACARAC (01-19) Paper 4 - Scheme of Delegation
4.2
The Committee commented that the substantial
assurance was a positive reflection on the work of the Finance Team’s engagement
with budget holders and the maturity of the scheme of delegation. In response
to questions around the levels of delegation, Nia Morgan described the
increased sense of ownership and interest in budget management, partly as a
result of allowing budget holders to set appropriate delegations in their
areas.
ACARAC (01-19) Paper 5 - GDPR Compliance Follow Up
4.3
The Committee welcomed this follow-up review of
assurances around GDPR compliance. Dave advised that a revised Data Protection
Policy had been approved by Executive Board, and that an electronic staff
training package would be ready for delivery in the coming weeks. This had been
developed in-house as there was nothing commercially available which was
suitable. The Commission agreed to consider how best to evidence receipt of
this training.
4.4
The Commission were considering options for
appointing a temporary Data Protection Officer to cover for maternity
leave. Team resilience would be
increased by training another member of staff.
4.5
The practical issues around data protection
agreements for elected members was being discussed further at an
inter-parliamentary forum at the end of February and this could inform
decisions around the Commission’s approach.
4.6
The Committee discussed testing the security of sensitive
personal information held by the Commission and the role and importance of the
Information Asset Registers and Registers of Personal Data. It was noted that
the move to SharePoint as a document management system would provide further
mitigation for information-related risks and that the forthcoming review of
cyber-security would help to test the controls. It was agreed that Dave and Bob
should consider this further.
4.7
Committee members asked for GDPR compliance to be
reviewed at a future meeting.
4.8
The Committee asked for the issue of the data
protection agreement with the HR/Payroll system provider to be re-visited, and
suggested keeping the ICO informed.
ACARAC (01-19) Paper 6 –
Payroll
4.9 The Committee asked for assurance that the recommendations from the previous audit had been implemented effectively. Gareth explained that the focus for this review was around the systems in place whereas the previous review had focused on data analytics for which assurance is provided from the routine and thorough reviews by the WAO when auditing the accounts. The effectiveness of data analytics was also discussed regularly at inter-parliamentary meetings. He also reported that inefficiencies around manual ... view the full minutes text for item 4
Meeting: 11/02/2019 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 103
Minutes:
ACARAC
(01-19) Paper 3 – update report
3.1
Gareth and Dave Tosh had met with the WAO to ensure
accurate reflection of the Assembly’s work in their forthcoming report on Welsh
public sector’s preparedness for Brexit. Dave briefly described the work in
terms of legislation and scenario planning. The Committee asked for an update
following a further planning session due to be held later that week.
3.2
Gareth had met with the Head of Procurement to
discuss timings of the audit into the Commission’s procurement approach in
terms of opportunities for Welsh suppliers to win contracts. It was agreed to
delay the audit until the Autumn of 2019 when there would be more evidence on
which to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach. In the meantime, a paper
was due to be presented to the Commission outlining the approach to engaging
Welsh suppliers. Given the potential political and reputational risks, and
recent scrutiny of the Welsh Government’s procurement procedures, Gareth agreed
to consider and discuss the timings further.
3.3
There were no concerns around implementation of
outstanding recommendations and an update would be provided at the next
meeting.
3.4
Gareth would be discussing the timing of the audit
into integrated committee support with Siwan Davies.
Actions
–
(3.1) Siwan Davies to share the update report on follow-up
Brexit meetings with the Committee.
–
(3.2) Gareth to consider and further discuss the timing of
the procurement audit.
–
(3.3) Gareth to present a report on implementation of
recommendations to the March meeting.
Meeting: 26/11/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Review HMT/other guidance for Audit and Risk Assurance Committees (Chair and Head of Internal Audit)
Minutes:
Oral item
7.1
The HM Treasury audit and risk assurance committee
handbook published in March 2016 remained the most up to date version. The Clerking team confirmed that the terms of
reference and forward work programme were based on the latest version of the
handbook. The Chair remained a member of
the WAO Committee Chairs forum and encouraged the future Committee chair to
become involved next year. He would share the latest WAO ARAC Chairs Forum
papers with Committee members and officials.
He also highlighted NAO guidance for digital transformation programmes,
challenging costs in major projects and excellence in reporting.
7.2
Gareth Watts had previously shared National Audit
Office, CIPFA and TIAA updates with Committee members and welcomed questions on
the information circulated.
7.3
Committee members asked if the WAO had any examples
of good practice to share with the Committee.
Gareth Lucey described a Good Practice hub on the WAO website for public
sector organisations and charities. The
Clerking team would ensure a link was circulated.
Action
– Eric Gregory to
circulate latest WAO ARAC Chairs Forum papers to Committee members and
officials (complete).
Meeting: 26/11/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Consider latest Internal Audit reports and Previously circulated IA Report(s)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 108
- Restricted enclosure 109
- Restricted enclosure 110
Minutes:
ACARAC (05-18) Paper 4 – Events
review (Moderate Assurance)
5.1
The Committee welcomed this report. The review was initiated by changes to the
booking system and to the structure of the team.
5.2
Manon Antoniazzi described the booking system that had been in
place for over a year and the on-going need to communicate and engage with
Assembly Members.
Action
– Gareth to circulate the
action plan for communications and benefits realisation.
ACARAC
(05-18) Paper 5 – Risk Management (Substantial Assurance)
5.3
The
Committee were encouraged by the result of this audit and paid tribute to
Kathryn Hughes and Jane Legge for their work in developing the system.
5.4
The
Chair confirmed that the Commission had demonstrated increasing risk management
maturity during his tenure, and that he was encouraged by the risk management
forums and networks in place and the involvement of staff at all levels.
5.5
Members questioned the roll-out of the new risk
management system, the training involved and how effective the risk forum was
in terms of engagement, especially if risk champions were absent from the
meeting. Gareth and Kathryn described
the training involved which included a full refresh of risk management for all
heads of service and risk champions.
They agreed that risk champions should be encouraged to attend, but felt
that the forum was established and robust enough to cope with a fluctuating
membership. Forum minutes were
circulated to Heads of Service and published internally which Kathryn felt kept
those involved updated.
5.6
The Committee queried the absence of issue
management reporting. This was in
development and would be presented by Dave at the February meeting.
Action
– Dave Tosh to present the
Committee with an issue management log.
ACARAC (05-18) Paper 6 – Assurance
Framework (Advisory Review, no assurance opinion)
6.1 The
Committee welcomed the positive review.
They suggested that a process flowchart would have helped clarify the
report, and that third line assurance should include the Independent Adviser
review of directorate governance statements.
Meeting: 26/11/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 113
Minutes:
ACARAC
(05-18) Paper 3 – update report
4.1
Gareth Watts presented his latest summary of the
Governance and Assurance team’s work. He
referenced a GDPR training course attended by the Data Protection Officer, the
CIPFA Better Governance Forum conference attended by the Governance Manager and
further professional development of the trainee internal auditor.
4.2
Gareth had discussed those elements within his plan
which were of most interest to the WAO, in particular regarding the financial
statements. He would continue to liaise with the WAO to ensure mutual support
in accordance with their joint working protocol.
4.3
When questioned by the Committee on the use of TIAA,
Gareth explained that as Head of Governance and Assurance, when areas within
his responsibility were audited, a provision in the Internal Audit Charter
stated that these audits had to be outsourced to ensure neutrality. He would update the new Committee members
regarding TIAA and invite a representative to the February meeting.
4.4
He confirmed that there were no outstanding recommendations
from 2016-17.
Action
–
Gareth to provide the new Committee members with
further information about TIAA and to invite a representative to the February
meeting.
Meeting: 18/06/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 8)
Latest Internal Audit Reports - Assembly Members' Allowances Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 116
Meeting: 18/06/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 7)
Internal Audit Fraud Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 119
Meeting: 18/06/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Internal Audit Annual Report 2017-18
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 122
Meeting: 18/06/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 125
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-18) Paper 3 – IA update report
Item
4 - Internal Audit Annual Report 2017-18
ACARAC
(03-18) Paper 4 – Internal Audit Annual Report and Opinion 2017-18
Item
5 - Internal Audit Fraud Report
ACARAC
(03-18) Paper 5 – Internal Audit Fraud Report
Item
6 - Latest Internal Audit Report
ACARAC
(03-18) Paper 6 – Assembly Members’ Allowances Audit Report
5.1
Gareth Watts presented these four
items to the Committee. His update report was noted and he outlined that his
Annual Report provided an overall opinion for 2017-18 that ‘…the framework of governance, risk
management and control is adequate and effective’ which was in line with
the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS) descriptions.
5.2 Gareth
highlighted areas where his work had added value to the organisation, for
example: establishing prioritisation criteria; review of the Investment and
Resourcing Board which had resulted in changes to the governance structure; and
the Capacity Review. He added that there was good general recognition of Internal
Audit’s advisory role.
5.3 Gareth
also informed the Committee of a trainee auditor within the Governance and
Assurance team who should be qualified by the end of the year. This was
welcomed by the Committee as necessary support for Gareth alongside the TIAA contract.
In response to questions about approval of the work produced by TIAA, Gareth
explained that, as the contract manager, he carried out quality assurance of
all reports produced by TIAA. He added that Dave would sign off audits of areas
within his remit, such as risk management and information governance.
5.4 The
Committee commended the completion of all the recommendations by management,
including the recommendations in relation to the audit on Key Financial
Controls, which had been implemented before the report was presented to the
Committee.
5.5 The
Committee encouraged Gareth to place additional focus on the Business
Directorate in future years and continue to ensure that his audit programme and
independence was not compromised.
5.6 Both
Gareth and Dave provided assurance to the Committee by describing how, as
outlined in the Internal Audit Charter update previously presented,
independence was safeguarded. Dave added that during their weekly catch-ups
Gareth’s work was discussed at length to ensure that there was no conflict of
interest and that his independence was protected.
5.7 Regarding
the Annual Report on Fraud, Gareth confirmed that the report covered third
party contractors and online card systems. During 2017-18 there were no
reported cases of fraudulent activity brought to Gareth’s attention.
5.8 Subsequent
to the implementation of the procurement card online system, and following the
Key Financial Controls audit, Nia continued to ensure that Heads of Service
approved purchases made using the cards to minimise any delays.
5.9 Gareth’s final item was the Assembly Members’ Allowances audit report. His assurance rating was moderate, with all four recommendations being agreed. He was assured that the Members’ Business Support (MBS) team were following the correct processes and procedures, and the identified duplicate payments (made by human error) were ... view the full minutes text for item 5
Meeting: 23/04/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 14)
Review the Internal Audit Charter and Internal Audit's compliance with Public Sector Internal Audit Standard (PSIAS)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 128
- Restricted enclosure 129
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 15 – Internal Audit Charter cover paper
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 15 – Internal Audit Charter
14.1
The
Committee noted the minor changes to the Internal Audit Charter which had been
updated in accordance with PSIAS, and approved the Charter for 2018-19.
Meeting: 23/04/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 11)
Internal Audit External Quality Assurance (EQA)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 132
- Restricted enclosure 133
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 9 – EQA cover paper
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper – progress of EQA action plan
11.1
The
Committee noted the good progress made against the recommendations raised in
the 2017 report.
Meeting: 23/04/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 10)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 136
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 8 – IA update report
10.1 Gareth introduced his update report.
He highlighted the progress made since the February meeting, which included the
completion of four internal audit reports. His additional commitments during
2017-18 meant that some internal audit work remained outstanding. He
congratulated Victoria Paris, who had recently passed Part 1 of the Certified
Internal Audit qualification.
10.2
The
Committee was content with the report and recognised the additional work Gareth
has been involved in over the past year. They questioned whether, given
Gareth’s additional workload, the Commission could make more use of TIAA.
Gareth acknowledged that there remains flexibility in the contract for this,
and highlighted the increase in resilience and in-house capacity for internal
audit which was also being introduced by training Victoria. He confirmed that
he was still in a position to present an annual opinion at the June 2018
meeting. He committed to keep the capacity and resourcing of internal audit
activity under review.
Meeting: 23/04/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 15)
Update from attendance at TIAA Audit Chairs Conference
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 139
- Restricted enclosure 140
Minutes:
Oral
Item
15.1
This item was deferred until the
July meeting.
Action
Update on the role of
Audit and Risk Assurance Committees and Internal Audit, including feedback from
the TIAA Chairs Conference, to be added to the July agenda.
Meeting: 23/04/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 13)
Latest Internal Audit Report and previously circulated reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 143
- Restricted enclosure 144
- Restricted enclosure 145
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 11 – Cyber Security
Previously circulate IA Reports
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 12 – AMs’ Pension Scheme
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 13 – GDPR
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 14 – Security Assurance Review
13.1 The Committee had discussed ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 11 – Cyber Security under agenda item 3. The Committee noted
the papers that had been previously circulated and agreed to discuss feedback
with Gareth in the private session which followed this meeting.
Meeting: 23/04/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 12)
Consider Internal Audit's outline audit plan for 2018-19
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 148
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-18) Paper 10 – Internal Audit Plan 2018-19
12.1
The
Committee approved the audit plan for 2018-19.
Meeting: 05/02/2018 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 151
Minutes:
ACARAC
(01-18) Paper 3 – IA progress report and monitoring recommendations
3.1
The
Committee questioned Gareth’s capacity to meet the
commitments outlined in his audit plan. He confirmed that the revised plan
takes account of his work on the Capacity Review and remained on target. His time had been spent almost exclusively on
the Capacity Review since the November meeting and number of reports would,
however, be circulated before the April meeting.
3.2
The Committee questioned the Commission’s
preparedness for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in May 2018.
Dave and Gareth believed that the level of engagement and the amount of
guidance produced by the Information Governance Manager, as well as the sharing
of documentation and practice with other organisations, demonstrated that the
Assembly Commission was well prepared.
3.3
The Committee were impressed with, and re-assured
by, the Commission’s pro-active approach, particularly the production of
guidance for Assembly Members in the absence of guidance for elected
representatives from the Information Commissioners Office (ICO). They suggested
this guidance could be shared with the ICO. They welcomed the forthcoming GDPR
- Preparedness Review which was due to take place in February.
3.4
Gareth highlighted that, as well as GDPR, the discussions
at the Intra Parliamentary Forum covered Brexit and the related devolution of
powers. Committee members agreed that the Commission’s ability to navigate
significant risk and related assurances within a political environment was
commendable.
3.5
Gareth’s External Quality Assurance (EQA) review of
the Northern Ireland Assembly was yet to be arranged. He would present progress
against his own EQA action plan at the next meeting.
Actions
-
Gareth to
present progress against his External Quality Assurance action plan at the
April meeting.
Meeting: 27/11/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Review HMT/other guidance for Audit and Risk Assurance Committees
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 154
Minutes:
Oral
update
ACARAC
(05-17) Paper 9 – NAO Guidance – Cyber and Information Security
6.1
Dave
provided an update on cyber and information security activity and future
plans. There was currently a focus on
raising awareness with Assembly Member Support Staff (AMSS) at Constituency
Offices. Mock phishing exercises on
Assembly Commission staff had proved positive in highlighting vulnerabilities
and the sharing of information between external organisations that Dave and his
colleagues were in contact with was also proving useful. Further information on testing and recovery
procedures was also discussed but due to the nature of the discussion, detail
minutes were not taken.
Actions
-
Dave to share details of existing
vulnerabilities and resolution plan with Committee members.
Meeting: 27/11/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Latest Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 157
- Restricted enclosure 158
- Restricted enclosure 159
- Restricted enclosure 160
Minutes:
ACARAC
(05-17) Paper 5 – New Finance System Controls
Reports/updates circulated out of committee
ACARAC (05-17) Paper 6 – Review of Committee
Integrated Teams
ACARAC
(05-17) Paper 7 – Internal Audit Recommendations – MBS Follow up report
ACARAC
(05-17) Paper 8 – Fraud Prevention and Detection
5.1
All
four audit reports were noted and Gareth had responded to the points raised by
the Committee on the pre-circulated reports. The Committee were very impressed
with the turnaround of the recommendations in the report on the Finance System
Controls.
5.2
Nia
was bitterly disappointed with the Limited Assurance rating, especially when
compared to the Strong rating given last time. She assured the Committee that
this was not a reflection of her team or the new system in place and there had
been no deterioration in services. Recommendations
concerning the documenting of tasks had been tightened, as had the process of
monitoring the time taken to approve credit card purchases. Nia would now see a list of outstanding
actions on a monthly basis to ensure the level never rose to that identified by
the audit. An exercise to review the
usage and number of credit cards was scheduled for December.
5.3
The
Committee also noted and discussed the responses to recommendations in the
Review of Committee Integrated Teams, in particular the acceptance and
timeliness of their implementation.
Meeting: 27/11/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 163
Minutes:
ACARAC (05-17) Paper 4 – IA progress report and monitoring
recommendations
4.1
Gareth presented his activity report and update on
recommendations. The Capacity Review was
consuming much of Gareth’s time and changes to his 2017-18 audit plan may be
necessary as a result. The Committee
noted the plan to defer the audit on change management.
monitoring recommendations
4.2
Gareth presented his activity report and update on
recommendations. The Capacity Review was
consuming much of Gareth’s time and changes to his 2017-18 audit plan may be
necessary as a result. The Committee
noted the plan to defer the audit on change management.
Meeting: 19/06/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 166
- Restricted enclosure 167
Minutes:
ACARAC (03-17) Paper 3 – IA update report
ACARAC (03-17) Paper 4 – PSIAS report
3.1
Gareth Watts introduced his update report. Fieldwork had begun on
the Integrated Committees audit which cut across six different service
areas. Due to the scale of this audit,
Gareth advised the Committee that this work was not likely to be completed
until the autumn.
3.2
The Committee welcomed Gareth’s Public Sector Internal Audit
Standards (PSIAS) report, which was presented to appraise the Committee of the
most recent changes to the standards. Gareth assured the Committee that no
changes were required to the Commission’s processes.
3.3
Gareth advised that he would shortly be able to share the outcome
of the tender exercise which had recently been completed for the Internal Audit
contract.
3.4
The Committee noted the final External Quality Assessment report,
which had been circulated out of committee. When questioned, Dave Tosh, as
Director of Resources confirmed he was satisfied with the assurances. Gareth
confirmed that this assessment was based on the previous version of the PSIAS
and that future assessments would be based on the revised version.
3.5
The Committee congratulated Nia Morgan and her team on the
successful migration of data to the new finance system. Nia expressed her thanks to her team for their
hard work during the implementation of this project, especially considering the
year-end obligations and reduced resources.
Action
-
Gareth Watts to share conclusion of
Internal Audit tender exercise with ACARAC members by email.
Meeting: 19/06/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Internal Audit Annual Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 170
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-17) Paper 10 – Internal Audit Annual Report and Opinion 2016-17
6.1 The
Committee approved Gareth’s annual report, which recognised that ‘…generally
adequate and effective risk management, control and governance processes were
in place…’, and congratulated him on his work and the continued contribution
internal audit had made to providing assurance.
They particularly welcomed the focus on the impact and outcomes of the
audit work and encouraged further focus on this in future reports. They were
also encouraged to hear that a team member was due to commence internal audit
training to further support his work.
Meeting: 19/06/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 173
- Restricted enclosure 174
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-17) Paper 5 – Assembly Members’ Allowances Audit Report
ACARAC
(03-17) Paper 6 – Advisory Internal Audit Report on GDPR (TIAA)
4.1
Gareth
presented two audit reports, both of which were welcomed by the Committee.
4.2
In
relation to the audit of Assembly Members’ Allowances, Gareth reported that
strong control procedures were in place for AMs’ expenses claims. He also advised that the introduction of
formal delegations of authority to office managers to submit claims on behalf
of AMs had improved efficiency. Suzy
Davies confirmed that, despite this delegated authority, AMs fully understood
their accountability for expenses claimed.
4.3
As
well as testing resettlement grants paid to outgoing AMs and redundancy
payments to outgoing AM support staff following the 2016 election, Gareth also
tested staff recruitment processes.
Management had accepted all three of his recommendations.
4.4
In
relation to the General Data Protection Regulation advisory audit, Gareth
advised that assurance could be taken from the minor nature of the
recommendations, which demonstrated the significant amount of preparatory work
carried out by the Commission. He also
referred to a working group which had been established and a high level action
plan which was being closely monitored by Alison Bond, the Commission’s
Information Governance Manager.
Committee members commended the comprehensive action plan which had been
circulated.
4.5
Dave
mentioned that, like other legislatures and organisations, they were awaiting
further detailed guidance from the Information Commissioner’s Office, which was
due in the autumn. Once this guidance was produced, the action plan would be
reviewed and would include a focus on advising Assembly Members as data
controllers.
4.6
The
Committee were impressed and encouraged by the amount of preparation and the
outcome of the advisory report, but urged officials not to be complacent. It was agreed that AMs and their staff should
be reminded of their obligations under the current data protection legislation
as well as any future changes.
Action
-
Gareth to provide an update on
recommendations of Assembly Members’ Allowances Audit report at the autumn
meeting.
Meeting: 19/06/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Consider any comments following report circulated out of committee
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 177
- Restricted enclosure 178
- Restricted enclosure 179
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-17) Paper 7 – Report on IRB Review
ACARAC
(03-17) Paper 8 – Update on IRB Review
ACARAC
(03-17) Paper 9 – Review of Closing Balances (data migration from CODA to NAV)
5.1
The
Committee welcomed all three reports, on which they had shared comments with
Gareth outside of the meeting.
5.2
Discussion
focused on the functions and responsibilities of the Commission’s Management
Board and Investment and Resources Board (IRB).
Manon advised that she and the Directors were about to review the
membership and roles of each board to ensure that they remained fit for purpose
and to provide clarity on decision-making responsibilities and processes.
5.3
In
response to questions about the level of challenge for IRB decisions, Dave
referred to the amount of challenge that took place before proposals were presented
to the board which the Committee thought could be clarified. Manon agreed to consider alternative methods
of communicating IRB decisions more widely, including with Commissioners, and
would share the results of the review of governance structures after an away
day.
5.4
The
Committee welcomed this positive review and the agreed actions and welcomed the
proactive way in which external scrutiny was invited.
Actions
-
Manon to consider methods of
communicating IRB decisions more widely.
-
Manon to share results of review of
governance structures post IRB away-day.
Meeting: 20/03/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Update Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 182
Minutes:
ACARAC (02-17) Paper 3 – IA update report
3.1
Gareth Watts introduced his update report. He outlined the work
being carried out on the audit of Assembly Members’ expenses, the final report
on which would be circulated in advance of the June meeting.
3.2
He had also worked with officials to scope the forthcoming audit
of integrated support for Assembly Committees and completed a review of the
migration of data from the legacy CODA finance system to the new Microsoft
Dynamics NAV system.
3.3
The review he had carried out of the Commission’s Investment and
Resourcing Board (IRB) was due to be discussed by the Board on 21 March. Gareth
agreed to circulate the report, along with details of the actions agreed by the
Board, to the Committee in advance of the June meeting.
3.4
The Internal Audit contract with TIAA would expire in 2017 and
Gareth and the procurement team had finalised the specification document to
start the tender process. The panel for reviewing tenders consisted of the Head
of Internal Audit, the Director of Finance and a Senior Procurement
Officer.
Meeting: 20/03/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 185
- Restricted enclosure 186
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-17) Paper 4 – Data Analytics (Payroll) review
ACARAC
(02-17) Paper 5 – Project Management
4.1
Gareth
presented two audit reports, both of which were welcomed by the Committee.
4.2
The
Data Analytics review demonstrated the integrity and robustness of the payroll
data and had indicated no evidence of any fraudulent behaviour. The Committee
questioned the validation necessary to prove the integrity of the data within
the HR/Payroll system. Gareth assured the Committee that data was thoroughly
checked and exception reporting took place where necessary. He then described
some of the reporting functions of the new finance system which included
contract spend analytics.
4.3
Gareth
introduced his second report on the review of the Commission’s approach to
project management where four recommendations had been identified and agreed by
management.
4.4
Given
the challenges that lay ahead for the Commission to deliver an ambitious set of
objectives, the Committee encouraged officials to develop clear criteria for
prioritising projects, and to focus on benefits realisation.
4.5
The
Committee again questioned the lack of project progress reporting within the
Corporate Performance (KPI) Report. Dave agreed to consider including the
Directors’ updates on progress of projects, which were provided quarterly to
IRB, as annexes to future KPI Reports.
4.6
Dave
was pleased to see real progress since Gareth’s previous review in 2015. He
described the process in place at the fortnightly IRB meetings to assess
resource and budget implications of projects, as well as how they contributed
to achieving the Commission’s strategic goals and priorities. He would take on
board the Committee’s suggestion of detailing prioritisation criteria in a more
formal manner.
4.7
The
Committee questioned the scrutiny of business cases and officials recognised
improvements were needed to capture lessons learned and to monitor benefit
realisation. It was agreed that further guidance was needed, including around
the development and iterations of business cases. Gareth also agreed to
circulate a useful report he had recently found on agile project management
methodology to Committee members.
4.8
Officials
welcomed the discussion on programme and project management and the Committee
welcomed a review of change management principles and processes which was
scheduled for September 2017. The current project guidance would be updated and
developed collaboratively by members of the Community of Practice and other key
stakeholders.
Actions
Data Analytics (Payroll) audit
-
Gareth to provide the Committee with
further information regarding the sample sizes used for data analytics.
Project
Management audit
-
Gareth to circulate
outcome of IRB review discussion in advance of the June meeting.
-
Dave to consider
prioritisation criteria for projects.
-
Dave to consider inclusion
of IRB ‘Directors updates’ as annexes to the KPI Report.
-
Gareth to circulate report
on agile project management methodology.
Meeting: 20/03/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 6)
Review the Internal Audit Charter and Internal Audit's compliance with Public Sector Internal Audit Standard (PSIAS)
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 189
- Restricted enclosure 190
- Restricted enclosure 191
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-17) Paper 7 – Internal Audit Charter cover paper
ACARAC
(02-17) Paper 7 – Internal Audit Charter
ACARAC
(02-17) Paper 8 – EQA Interim Report
6.1 The
Committee noted the revised Internal Audit Charter for 2017-18 and welcomed the
interim External Quality Assessment Report, produced by Andrew Munro, Head of
Internal Audit at the Scottish Parliament. The report concluded that the
internal audit service generally conforms to internal auditing standards as set
out by, and in accordance with, HM Treasury’s Internal Audit Quality Assessment
Framework. The Committee congratulated Gareth on such a positive result and
requested the final report be circulated out of committee.
Action
-
Gareth
to circulate the EQA Final Report to Committee members.
Meeting: 20/03/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Consider Internal Audit's outline audit plan for 2017-18
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 194
Minutes:
ACARAC
(02-17) Paper 6 – Internal Audit Plan 2017-18
5.1
The
Committee approved Gareth’s audit plan for 2017-18. Gareth assured the Committee that his key
areas of focus were in line with the Commission’s corporate risks. The Committee
questioned whether there was enough focus on the Assembly Business function as
this was where the forthcoming changes would be concentrated. The Committee
were satisfied with Gareth’s response around covering the change management
elements in the review planned for September 2017, and for flexing his plan to
accommodate specific areas of concern during the year.
5.2
Gareth
would be using internal resource to assist him with his review of integrated
support for Committees. He had also
added indicative days to the audit plan to ensure the Committee understood his
commitments.
Meeting: 06/02/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 197
Minutes:
4.0 Item 4 – Latest
Internal Audit Report
ACARAC
(01-17) Paper 5 – Cyber Security
4.1
The
Cyber Security audit resulted in a ‘needs improvement’ rating. This was
due to the amount of work which was still in progress to improve the Assembly Commission’s
arrangements for cyber security. 12
recommendations had been raised to enhance the current arrangement but none of
these were High/Critical priority.
4.2
The
Chair felt that this was a thorough report and that the Commission was
well-sighted on quickly delivering the recommendations. He agreed with the Commission’s rejection of
one of the recommendations.
4.3
Dave
described the work that was taking place on a UK-wide level and confirmed all
12 recommendations would be complete by the end of the 2016-17 financial
year. The appointment of a cyber
security network specialist within the ICT team would further strengthen this
area, although he recognised the challenges facing the organisation and the
importance of raising awareness with Commission staff, AMs and support
staff. Gareth would follow up on the
ISO27001:2013 review and continue to meet on a regular basis with the Head of
ICT before performing a follow up audit and updating the Committee when
appropriate.
4.4
Dave
confirmed that cyber security was about to be added to the Commission’s
Corporate Risk Register and the Committee questioned whether bringing the ICT
function in-house had highlighted historic failings in the security of the
network. Dave confirmed that the
transition to in-house ICT services had exposed some vulnerabilities with the
outsourced arrangement but the control gained by bringing the services in-house
had improved the situation.
Meeting: 06/02/2017 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 200
- Restricted enclosure 201
Minutes:
Internal Audit
3.0
Item
3 – Internal Audit Activity Report
ACARAC (01-17) Paper 3 – IA progress report
ACARAC (01-17) Paper 4 – IA Monitoring Recommendations
3.1
The Committee welcomed Gareth’s progress report and monitoring
documents. A Payroll audit had commenced
and the final report would be circulated out of committee, as would the IRB
review.
3.2
Gareth was scheduled to audit the payments made to Assembly
Members (AMs) in terms of resettlement grants, redundancy payments to AM
Support Staff, and setting up regional and constituency offices of new AMs
following the Fifth Assembly elections.
3.3
Gareth advised that the contract for the co-sourced Internal Audit
arrangements would be awarded in June 2017.
3.4
After some discussion on the scope and sample sizes of the
specific audits that Gareth was about to undertake, the Committee suggested
that he consider how best to report the outcomes and benefits to the Commission
of his audit reports, as well as recommendations that had been rejected by
Management.
Actions
-
Gareth
to circulate recommendations and actions from the review of IRB after
consideration by IRB.
-
Gareth to capture the
outcomes of recommendations made by audit reviews in future reports.
-
Gareth
to include in IA reports recommendations that are not accepted by Management,
and the reasons for this.
Meeting: 21/11/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 204
- Restricted enclosure 205
Minutes:
Internal Audit
3.0
Item 3 – Internal Audit
Activity Report
ACARAC (05-16) Paper 3 – IA progress report
ACARAC (05-16)
Paper 4 – IA Monitoring Recommendations
3.1
Gareth introduced his usual progress update documents which described
the areas of focus during 2016-17. He also detailed his Continuous Professional
Development including attending an Intra Parliamentary Heads of Internal Audit
meeting and other networking opportunities such as meetings with Heads of
Internal Audit from other public sector organisations across Wales.
3.2
The Committee asked how Gareth would approach the re-tendering of
the Internal Audit contract, as the contract with TIAA was due to expire in
July 2017. Gareth proposed continuing
with a co-sourced arrangement, for which he would expect several tenders but
said he would also build resilience within the team with a view to carrying out
more in-house reviews.
3.3
The Chair thanked Gareth for his comprehensive
updates and reminded the Committee that Gareth relies on a co-sourced partner
to help him deliver the internal audit work. He also expressed his hope that
there would be strong competition for the procurement exercise.
3.4
Gareth then explained how he had scoped the audit of Assembly
Member expenses which would now be done in-house. He had discussed the audit with the WAO and
with Members’ Business Support, primarily to gain an understanding of their
work and the systems in place. His main
focus would be on the resettlement grant and the cost of office set up
following the election. The audit was on
track to report to the Committee in April.
3.5
In accordance with Public Sector Internal Audit Standards, on a
quinquennial basis the Head of Internal Audit is required to perform an
External Quality Assurance (EQA) Review.
At the recent Intra Parliamentary Forum meeting (17 November), Gareth
had mentioned the possibility of carrying out this review through reciprocal
arrangements with the other legislatures.
He had also taken advice on this from his counterpart in the Welsh
Government who was involved in setting the guidelines and standards for such
reviews.
3.6
The Committee questioned the impartiality and independence of such
an arrangement and Gareth explained it would be based on an initial
self-assessment with external validation by one of his counterparts. They
suggested that the standard review framework should be adapted to capture how
each of the legislatures work differently.
The reviewer should also be adequately qualified to perform the review.
3.7
Claire Clancy assured the Committee that assurance on the external
validation would be sought as appropriate.
3.8
The Committee questioned why the number of high priority
recommendations had fallen significantly over the past three years. Gareth suggested that it was dependent on the
subject matter and that in previous years there had been several audits with
numerous audit recommendations such as those on Recruitment, Security and the
HR-Payroll project. More recently subject areas audited had received more positive
audit opinions and hence fewer recommendations.
3.9 Dave Tosh added that work undertaken to embed governance and compliance within the organisation ... view the full minutes text for item 3
Meeting: 21/11/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit reports circulated in October
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 208
- Restricted enclosure 209
- Restricted enclosure 210
- Restricted enclosure 211
- Restricted enclosure 212
Minutes:
5.0
Item
5 – Internal Audit reports circulated in October
ACARAC
(05-16) Paper 6 - Assurance review of VES
ACARAC
(05-16) Paper 7 - Cyber Security Briefing note – (to be discussed under item 8)
ACARAC
(05-16) Paper 8 - Procurement Audit – update report
ACARAC
(05-16) Paper 9 - Risk Management IA report cover paper
ACARAC
(05-16) Paper 9 - Annex A - Risk Management Audit Report
5.1
The Committee thanked Gareth for
circulating a number of papers out of committee and for sharing his responses
to the comments he had received. Gareth
agreed that he would re-introduce acceptance or rejection of Internal Audit
recommendations in his reports.
5.2
The Clerking team confirmed that
the papers contained within the pack were the same as those circulated in
October and they would consider referencing these papers differently in future.
Actions
-
Re-introduce acceptance
or rejection of Internal Audit recommendations in reports.
-
Clerking team to clarify referencing of papers that
have been circulated out of committee.
Meeting: 21/11/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 215
Minutes:
4.0
Item 4 – Latest Internal
Audit Report
ACARAC
(05-16) Paper 5 – Pensions Administration
4.1
The
Pensions Administration audit resulted in a ‘strong’ rating. It was reported that there were strong arrangements
in place for the administration of both the Principal Civil Service Pension
Scheme and the AMSS pension schemes.
Opportunities were identified to improve efficiency and reduce the need
for further manual intervention.
4.2
Gareth
confirmed that recommendations had been accepted and that implementation was in
progress. The need for manual
intervention would be removed by January when a validation exercise would be
carried out.
Meeting: 13/06/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Internal Audit Annual Report
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-16) Paper 4 – IA Annual Report
4.1
Gareth
presented his 2015-16 Internal Audit Annual Opinion and Report. This report provided an overview of the work
undertaken by the Internal Audit service during the year and provided an
opinion based on that work and other wider observations.
4.2
In
response to questions from Committee members about outstanding recommendations,
Gareth explained that these related to the documentation of processes for key
performance indicators (KPIs) for which a review was on-going by members of his
team. The review, which was considering
the process of collating and reporting on the KPIs as well as how meaningful
they were, would address these recommendations.
He confirmed that engagement with Heads of Service had so far been
positive.
4.3
Gareth’s
opinion stated, ‘the Assembly Commission
has adequate and effective risk management, control and governance processes to
manage the achievement of its objectives.’
4.4
Gareth
had shared his report with Ann-Marie Harkin and Matthew Coe prior to this
meeting. They both praised the report
for its detail and informed the Committee that they had used the key financial
controls audit to aid them when auditing the accounts.
4.5
The
Committee welcomed this comprehensive report and Gareth’s audit opinion. They
encouraged Gareth to share reports and updates with them through the year which
he was more than happy to do.
4.6
In
relation to the review of the Commission’s Fraud, Bribery and Corruption
policy, the Committee suggested checking the relevance of recent Ministry of
Justice guidance on fraud and bribery.
Actions
-
Gareth to check Ministry
of Justice guidance on fraud and bribery risk assessments and report findings
to the Committee.
Meeting: 13/06/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Minutes:
ACARAC
(03-16) Paper 3 - IA Update Report
2015-16
3.1
Gareth
Watts updated the Committee on recent audit work. He had finalised all 2015-16 audits and had
completed his Annual Report and the Annual Report on Fraud. He had also completed a self-assessment against
the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS).
3.2
Gareth
had discussed his 2016-17 audit plan with the TIAA, the Commission’s outsourced
internal audit service provider, and an audit of risk management had commenced
on Monday 13 June.
3.3
Although
the focus would be on future audits, which could be subject to change depending
on the new Assembly Commission’s priorities, Gareth assured the Committee that
he would continue to follow-up on recommendations from prior years’ audits. The Committee welcomed this, particularly in
relation to the procurement follow-up audit.
Gareth would also continue to provide assurance on: the Voluntary Exit
Scheme; be an active member of project board for the new finance system; and
carry out a review of the Investment and Resourcing Board (IRB).
3.4
In
relation to HM Treasury’s revised Audit and Risk Assurance Committee Handbook,
the Committee suggested further consideration should be given to the relevance
of guidance in the new appendices on cyber security and whistleblowing.
3.5
The
Committee asked for clarification on the timing of the External Quality
Assurance (EQA) of internal audit services and the outcome of a review of the
Governance and Audit team. Gareth
explained that whilst PSIAS required the EQA be completed by 2018, he was
aiming to complete it sooner. He also
described how an away day had generated clear proposals on how to take the team
forward. He agreed to keep the Committee
informed of any changes.
Action
-
Gareth to review
appendices of HMT’s revised Audit and Risk Assurance Committee Handbook
regarding cyber security and whistleblowing and report findings to the
Committee.
-
Gareth to update the
Committee in November of changes to the Governance and Audit team.
Meeting: 25/04/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 7)
Update Joint Working Protocol with Internal Audit
Minutes:
Oral item
7.1
Gareth
informed the Committee that an updated working protocol approved in April 2015
had been reviewed and remained valid. He
regularly meets with a Team Lead from the WAO to discuss the ongoing working
relationship. The Committee welcomed this
evidence of a continued strong working relationship with external audit.
7.2
The
Committee also noted that the WAO would be carrying out the external review on
compliance with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards.
Meeting: 25/04/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Consider Internal Audit's outline audit plan for 2016-17
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 224
Minutes:
ACARAC (31) Paper 8 – IA
outline plan 2016-17
5.1
The
Committee had approved Gareth’s strategy at the February meeting and welcomed
his outline plan for 2016-17.
5.2
When
questioned whether his plan should include the new finance system, Gareth
agreed to discuss this with Nia to determine the level of assurance required by
the project board.
5.3
Gareth
also provided the Committee with some further information on the planned
security review. Following a period of
restructuring within the team, Gareth wanted to ensure that the changes were
well embedded within the service area before carrying out his review.
5.4
A
wider discussion centred on security provided by South Wales Police. Claire assured the Committee that the
financial implications of increasing the police presence had been considered
carefully to ensure they were necessary and cost effective.
5.5
Dave
also provided an update on work to assess the Commission’s exposure to cyber
security risks, including the engagement of an inspector from North Wales to
help identify and manage risks of attacks to our Building Management System.
Meeting: 25/04/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Report & Previously circulated IA reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 227
- Restricted enclosure 228
- Restricted enclosure 229
- Restricted enclosure 230
Minutes:
ACARAC
(32) Paper 4 – Making the most of the Assembly Estate
4.1
Gareth
presented this review which detailed the progress made against one of the
Commission’s corporate priorities. He
informed the Committee that a new Visitor Experience and Venue Manager had
recently been appointed who would take the recommendations forward.
4.2
In
response to questions from Committee members on refurbishing Members’
accommodation, Gareth and Dave explained the work had been undertaken as part
of the planned maintenance programme.
4.3
A
further discussion centred on the long-term value for money on the use of the
Assembly estate, including the potential to purchase Tŷ Hywel. Dave agreed to revisit this. It was agreed that wider considerations about
accessibility to the Cardiff Bay area were important, but largely outside the
Commission’s control.
4.4
The
Committee welcomed this comprehensive report especially in addressing the
objectives set by the Commission, and encouraged the continued use of visitor
experience feedback.
Action
-
Dave to investigate
options for the purchase of Tŷ Hywel.
Previously
Circulated IA reports
ACARAC
(32) Paper 5 – Bilingual Services
ACARAC
(32) Paper 6 – Data Analytics
ACARAC (32)
Paper 7 – Budgetary Control
4.5
Three
internal audit reports were circulated out of committee on 30 March and Gareth
summarised the comments/queries he had received. One point highlighted was that the support to
individuals and the use of technology identified in the Enhanced Bilingual Services audit should be applauded.
4.6
The
Data Analytics audit, undertaken by
TIAA, confirmed that there was no indication of fraudulent behaviour during the
financial year in question. Committee members suggested that the objective of
future audits should explicitly state that its purpose is to identify any
evidence of fraudulent behaviour.
4.7
The
audit on Budgetary Control had
identified some areas that could be improved with a new finance system but Nia
confirmed that the manual workarounds, although resource intensive, were
effective.
Meeting: 25/04/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 233
Minutes:
ACARAC
(32) Paper 3 - IA Update Report
2015-16
3.1
Gareth
Watts updated the Committee on recent audit work. In February, he had attended an
Inter-Parliamentary Internal Audit Forum where they had discussed approaches to
planning, cyber security and Members’ expenses.
3.2
Gareth
had provided details of the discussions around cyber security at the forum to
the Commission’s Head of ICT and Broadcasting who would consider how to take
this on board.
3.3
It
had also been agreed that Gareth would be taking over future audits of Members’
expenses from the WAO, as this was more cost-effective.
3.4
At
a recent Investment and Resourcing Board (IRB) meeting, the business case for
replacing the finance system was approved and Gareth confirmed that he would
attend meetings of the project board.
3.5
Gareth
advised that, as well as a planned effectiveness review of the IRB, he had been
considering options for the governance team to provide additional support for
programmes and projects. The Chair encouraged him to consider agile techniques
as part of this review.
3.6
As
a recently appointed member of the Coleg Gwent Audit Committee, Gareth
described the contributions he had made and the networking opportunities this
had brought. As Coleg Gwent had recently
implemented a new finance system he would share contact information with Nia
Morgan.
Meeting: 08/02/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Strategy for 2016-17
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 236
Minutes:
ACARAC (31) Paper 7 –
Internal Audit Strategy 2016-17
5.1
Gareth
presented his strategy document for 2016-17 which would be subject to change on
appointment of the new Assembly Commission.
As always, he would continue to share instances of good practice and
amend his way of working if he felt it would benefit internal audit.
5.2
Pending
a change to include a link to the working protocol between Internal Audit and
External Audit, the committee approved the strategy.
Action
-
Gareth to include
reference in the Internal Audit Charter section of the strategy to the working
protocol between Internal Audit and External Audit.
Meeting: 08/02/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 239
Minutes:
ACARAC
(31) Paper 6 – Key Financial Controls
4.1
The
audit of the Key Financial Controls was carried out by TIAA and a strong rating
given. Gareth commented that a full
complement of staff in the Finance team had significantly increased the
robustness and strength of the controls in place. Committee members commended the Finance team
on the robustness of controls.
4.2
The
WAO were pleased with the assessment and would hopefully be able to place some
reliance on this during the audit of the accounts.
4.3
Committee
members were assured that despite the limitations already identified in the
current finance system, the necessary controls were in place.
4.4
Committee
members then questioned the dissemination of information to those outside of
the finance team. Officials informed the
committee that Finance Co-ordinators exists within each service area and
monthly meetings were used to share information, as well as regular meetings
with budget holders to discuss forecasting and staffing matters.
4.5
Finally,
the committee suggested that officials should check the process in place for
recovery of overpayments.
Meeting: 08/02/2016 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit update
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 242
- Restricted enclosure 243
- Restricted enclosure 244
Minutes:
ACARAC
(31) Paper 3 - IA Update Report
2015-16
ACARAC (31) Papers 4 & 5 – IA
Recommendations Monitoring
3.1
Gareth
Watts updated the committee on recent audit work undertaken. Audits on Enhanced Bilingual Services and
Financial Management and Budgetary Control were complete and would be
circulated outside of the meeting, once management responses had been
received. Work on Data Analytics was
scheduled for the end of February and again, Gareth planned to circulate this
report out of committee.
3.2 Claire Clancy and Dave Tosh had recently approved a paper
outlining a revised Governance and Audit team structure. Although not circulated to the committee,
Gareth would discuss his proposal during the private session between committee
members and the Head of Internal Audit.
3.3
Gareth
then updated the committee on work that he and Kathryn Hughes had undertaken on
the Governance and Assurance Frameworks.
They had met with Directors and Heads of Service and were in the process
of analysing the completed Assurance Mapping tables, progress on which would be
presented to the committee in April.
3.4
With
specific reference to the recent public engagement audit, the committee urged
officials to share good practice and lessons learnt with future Assembly
Committees and Commissioners.
3.5
When
questioned on the number of recommendations made during his time at the
Commission, Gareth believed that the variation on numbers year on year
reflected the different topics investigated and the amount of issues identified
with the different subject areas. For
example, the high number of recommendations in 2014-15 could largely be
attributed to the audits of Recruitment and Security. 2012-13, due to the changes in Internal Audit
arrangements, had been one of transition and there had been more focus on
follow up of prior years’ recommendations.
3.6
The
Chair noted that Internal Audit’s processes for monitoring and reporting
recommendations were now more streamlined and proactive, and Claire indicated
she was happy with the current approach to Internal Audit work focussing on
areas of highest risk and concern which would sometimes result in high numbers
of recommendations.
3.7
Committee
members were
very encouraged that there were no concerns about any of the management
responses to, and progress on, audit recommendations.
Action
-
Gareth to circulate audit
reports on Bilingual Services, Financial Management and Budgetary Control and
Data Analytics out of committee.
Meeting: 16/11/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 247
- Restricted enclosure 248
Minutes:
ACARAC
(30) Paper 5 – Audit Report - Public Engagement
ACARAC (30)
Paper 6 – Quality Assurance and CPD Updates
4.1
The
Committee welcomed the Public Engagement audit report, noting that the Assembly
is fully focussed on public engagement. That said, the Committee felt that
participation methods needed to be reviewed, the organisation needed to be more
resilient to negative press and should strive for more positive coverage of its
activities.
4.2
Claire
Clancy informed the Committee that, following negative feedback from several
sources, the website needed substantial improvement. Funds had been allocated by the Investment
and Resourcing Board to make the website more accessible and navigable. The Committee welcomed this commitment and emphasised
that improvements should be enduring.
4.3
Officials
confirmed that the Engagement Strategy would be a high priority and developed
by the Fifth Assembly. The strategy
should consider what indicators would be used to measure performance. The Committee suggested that engagement in
general should be considered when discussing the risks around future
constitutional change.
4.4
As
agreed by the Chair, Gareth issued the Procurement audit and ICT Futures Review
reports in October.
4.5
Since
the Procurement audit, training sessions had been arranged with a positive take
up. Extracting management information
from CODA (the finance system) was problematic but the National Procurement
Service had provided information spend analysis on commodity buying which would
enhance the quality of management information available to the Procurement Team
for monitoring purposes. Gareth assured
the Committee that non-compliance of procurement rules was taken very seriously
by management and he was comfortable with progress being made and the actions
management are taking to address the issues.
4.6
The
Committee questioned the lack of a benefits realisation report for the ICT
Futures Review. Officials confirmed that
a full review of the benefits was not carried out at project closure and this
had been agreed at various checkpoints, throughout the life of the
project. Wider project management
guidance and a benefits framework was now in place to ensure that benefits
realisation had appropriate focus in the future.
4.7
The
Chair congratulated Gareth on his recent appointment to Coleg Gwent’s Audit
Committee.
Action
-
Gareth to follow up Public
Engagement recommendations.
Meeting: 16/11/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit update
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 251
- Restricted enclosure 252
Minutes:
ACARAC
(30) Paper 3 - Internal Audit Update Report 2015-16
ACARAC
(30) Paper 4 – Internal Audit Recommendations – Monitoring
3.1
Gareth
Watts updated the Committee on progress against his 2015-16 audit plan. He assured the Committee that his planned
schedule of work was on course and that he would continue to monitor the outstanding
recommendations. Good progress was being
made in implementing the recommendations from previous audits, including Value
for Money and Expert Advisors. Gareth
agreed to present an itemised report of outstanding actions in February
2016.
3.2
The
Committee welcomed Gareth’s update on a series of meetings that he had attended
with Kathryn Hughes (Risk Manager) and Heads of Service. The ‘Governance Matters’ meetings were part
of the Assurance Framework, building on the Assurance and Governance statement
and raising the profile of the Governance and Audit team. Once approved, Gareth agreed to share an
updated Governance and Audit team structure with the Committee.
3.3
Over
the coming months, he would focus on providing assurance of the Commission’s
enhanced bilingual services and key financial controls. In addition to the approved plan, he has
agreed an additional piece of work with the Director of Finance on controls
over pension disclosures.
Actions
-
Gareth to provide an itemised
report of outstanding recommendations of the last four years.
-
Gareth to present updated
Governance Framework.
-
Gareth to update ACARAC on
revised Governance and Audit team structure.
Meeting: 08/06/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit update
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 255
Minutes:
ACARAC (28) Paper 3 - IA
Progress Report
3.1
Gareth
updated the Committee on activity since the April meeting. The scope for the procurement audit had been
finalised and a report would be produced over the summer.
3.2
The
Committee asked about activity planned for January 2016 – ‘Value for Money
Study into making use of the Assembly Estate’, in light of proposals to review
business efficiency more widely. Gareth
explained that this was linked to one of the Assembly Commission’s key
priorities. Dave Tosh and Mike Snook
would lead on this work, which would feed into the wider business efficiency
review. The Committee also asked about
the results of the benchmarking of the Governance Statement against WAO
guidance. Gareth explained that this showed that all guidance had been taken
into account.
3.3
Nicola
Callow informed the Committee that the business case for the replacement
finance system project had been scrutinised by the Investment and Resourcing
Board (IRB) and Keith Baldwin. A revised
business case would be presented to the IRB before the procurement
exercise.
Meeting: 08/06/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Internal Audit Annual Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 258
Minutes:
ACARAC
(28) Paper 4 – IA Annual Report
4.1
The
Committee considered the report to be a good assessment of work undertaken by Gareth
during the year. Committee members were
encouraged by the forums and events that he had attended recently and his
pro-active approach in seeking contacts and examples of good practice. Gareth agreed to share these best practice
methods with the Committee.
Actions
-
Gareth Watts to share
experiences of public sector internal audit best practice
Meeting: 08/06/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Framework
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 261
- Restricted enclosure 262
Minutes:
ACARAC
(28) Paper 5 – Quality Assessment Framework – cover paper
ACARAC (28) Paper 6 –
Quality Assessment Framework
5.1
Gareth
provided the Committee with a summary of the results of a self-assessment
against the Internal Audit Quality Assurance and Improvement Programme, carried
out in line with requirements of the Public Sector Internal Audit
Standards.
5.2
He
commented on his work to raise the profile of Internal Audit within the
organisation and felt that engagement had improved since he was appointed. A scoping exercise needed to take place,
before exploring potential procurement routes and suppliers to carry out an
external review.
5.3
The
Committee thanked Gareth for his update and welcomed the suggestion from him to
update the Committee on progress against actions in the future. Committee members also welcomed his
self-critical approach.
Actions
-
Gareth Watts to provide
regular updates on progress against actions contained in the Internal Audit
Quality Assessment Framework.
Meeting: 20/04/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 265
- Restricted enclosure 266
- Restricted enclosure 267
Minutes:
ACARAC (27)
Paper 6 - Review of the appointment of Expert Advisers to Committees
4.1
The
Committee welcomed this report and the robust recommendations to strengthen the
process, which they hoped to see implemented so that expert advisors are used more
widely and effectively in the future. As
part of this, they suggested that officials should examine the need for
training for Committee Chairs or Clerks and Deputy Clerks in the use of expert
advisors. They reflected on the
potential conflicts of interest but recognised the small pool of experts
available to some Committees. The
evaluation of the effectiveness of advisers was also encouraged. Members noted that the Commission should
consider the NAO Report from November 2014 and take account of this and any
additional guidance the Wales Audit Office may provide on managing conflicts in
the future.
Actions
-
Appointment
of Expert Advisors to Committees – ensure the agreed recommendations are
implemented and that there are no obstacles to using expert advisors in the
future.
-
Examine
the need for, and if appropriate make available, training for Committee Chairs
or Clerks and Deputy Clerks in the use of Expert Advisors.
ACARAC (27) Paper 7 –
Value for Money report
4.2
Gareth
was pleased to report that there was a strong Value for Money (VfM) culture
across the organisation, although efficiencies could be more widely
captured.
4.3
The
Committee queried whether recruitment delays should be reflected as VfM
savings. Claire confirmed that delays in
appointing staff were sometimes inevitable and that recruitment had sometimes
been purposely delayed in order to deliver savings.
4.4
Nicola’s
team had discussed savings with Heads of Service across the organisation and
VfM savings would be captured in the Annual Accounts.
4.5
The
Chair welcomed the inclusion of this information in the accounts and encouraged
officials to concentrate on capturing efficiency/process streamlining and
procurement savings.
ACARAC (27) Paper 8 -
Review of the Assembly Commission’s Project Management Arrangements (also item
12)
4.6
Gareth’s
audit confirmed that there were no surprises in this area. Many of the historical issues that had been
identified would continue to be addressed.
Business cases could be sharper, as could post implementation reviews
and benefits realisation analysis.
4.7
Dave
informed the Committee of the increased involvement of Business Analysts in
projects and the on-going work on benefits management. He highlighted the culture already embedded
in some areas of the Assembly where formal project management processes were in
place.
4.8
Committee
Members urged officials to ensure that there was a sufficient focus on
delivery, that clear objectives were set and that post project reviews captured
and shared lessons learned.
4.9
The
Chair welcomed both papers, was satisfied with progress to date and noted that
the papers were complementary.
Meeting: 20/04/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Review of the Internal Audit Charter
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 270
Minutes:
ACARAC
(27) Paper 9 – Internal Audit Charter
5.1
Gareth
highlighted the sole change to the charter which was that his reporting line
was directly to Claire Clancy.
5.2
The
Committee were content with the charter.
Meeting: 20/04/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 273
- Restricted enclosure 274
- Restricted enclosure 275
Minutes:
ACARAC
(27) Paper 3 – Progress report 2014-15 IA Programme
ACARAC
(27) Paper 4 – IA Recommendations – Monitoring
ACARAC
(27) Paper 5 – Internal Audit Strategy 2013-16
3.1
Gareth
Watts had completed his 2014-15 programme of work and focussed on the good
progress made in relation to 2014-15 recommendations.
3.2
The
Committee questioned the Data Analytics -
accounts payable audit which did not have a conclusion rating. Gareth confirmed that he had no concerns
regarding the integrity of the data or the risk of fraud.
3.3
They
also asked for details of Gareth’s plans to audit the Finance Accounting System. Nicola
Callow and Gareth confirmed that when a project was established, he would
schedule it into his work programme.
Nicola had shared the business case with TIAA and received some valuable
feedback. She would also review the
initiative with Keith Baldwin.
3.4
Gareth
confirmed that he would be including his vision for the role of Internal Audit
in the Assembly as part of his forward programme of work. He would also discuss with the Head of
Communications whether the Better Engagement audit could be brought forward.
3.5
The
Chair thanked Gareth for his revised strategy and welcomed his flexible
approach, especially the increased focus on Assembly Business areas.
3.6
The Committee then received an update from
Mike Snook on the Security Vetting audit.
His team had identified those employees who required Security Clearance
(SC) and had been working to ensure they were all vetted by the start of summer
recess in July 2015.
3.7
For
the lower level clearance (CTC), discussions were on-going with the trade
unions and the vetting process should be completed by May 2016. Mike and Dave Tosh had also spoken with the
Welsh Government about their approach.
3.8
Committee
members were assured that there are close links with South Wales Police (SWP),
but questioned whether all intelligence was being shared with Assembly
Officials at appropriate times.
3.9
Dave
confirmed that SWP had been heavily involved in discussions recently and were
providing the Assembly Commission with updates and intelligence. The Assembly Commission would be discussing
security in the round at their meeting on 23 April.
3.10 Overall, Committee members
and Internal Audit were satisfied with progress.
Actions
-
Discuss
with SWP whether there is further intelligence on local threats that they are
able to share and how this can be disseminated more widely.
-
IA
Strategy 2013-16 - Ensure the IA strategy document captures the vision for the
future role of Internal Audit in the Assembly.
-
Ensure
information contained in tables presented in the IA Strategy and the IA Charter
is aligned.
-
Better
Engagement
- assess
whether the date of the final report can be brought forward from January 2016
to autumn 2015.
Meeting: 09/02/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 17)
Promoting cooperation between auditors and other review bodies
Minutes:
17.1 Gareth
would be presenting the working protocol with WAO at the April meeting, which
reflected some updates. The Chair also
asked Gareth to consider and summarise sources, or potential sources of
external assurance, to complement those identified in the Assurance Framework.
Action
- Gareth to summarise sources, or potential sources of
external assurance.
Meeting: 09/02/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 5)
Proposed Internal Audit Strategy and Periodic Work Plan
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 280
Minutes:
5.1 Eric
welcomed the update from Gareth and congratulated him on raising the profile of
Internal Audit across the Commission. He
would like reassurance that the strategy could be flexed depending on
priorities. He also requested a summary of
the feedback received from Heads of Service involved in audits.
5.2 Committee
members requested clarification on how the audit on Better Engagement with the
People of Wales would add value as the measurement of success was not as
tangible as in other areas. They also
re-emphasised the importance of focussing on the Assembly Business Directorate
and asked Gareth to describe the Governance and Audit Service audit.
5.3 Gareth
thanked the Committee for their comments and agreed to provide further detail
in April, along with a summary of the comments received from Heads of
Service. His audit of the services
provided by Governance and Audit would involve benchmarking against other
organisations and potentially identifying different ways of delivering
services.
Actions
- Take on board the Committee’s
comments on the Internal Audit Strategy 2013-16 and present a final version to
the Committee in April. Including:
o
Flexibility
and how plan may be refreshed,
o
balanced
focus on business areas,
o
detailed
timetable for 2014-15.
- Incorporate feedback from audit sponsors in the
Internal Audit Annual Report.
Meeting: 09/02/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 283
- Restricted enclosure 284
Minutes:
3.1
Gareth
Watts provided an update on progress against the 2014-15 audit programme. The Committee agreed that progress was
positive but suggested that Gareth should ensure appropriate focus on the
Assembly Business Directorate in the 2015-16 audit plan.
Meeting: 09/02/2015 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 287
- Restricted enclosure 288
- Restricted enclosure 289
Minutes:
4.1
Gareth
introduced the three reports and assured the Committee that he was satisfied
with the Management Board responses.
4.2
The
Payroll audit highlighted that controls were in place and working effectively,
although policies and procedures could be improved. Gareth would update the Committee at future
meetings as part of his recommendations monitoring reports.
4.3
The
Legislative Work Bench audit highlighted some historical issues around project
management practices but the audit focused on the user experience rather than
implementation of the system. Officials
at the Commission made good use of the system.
The joint contract with Welsh Government was due to expire in 2017 and
the decision on whether to retain or replace the system would ultimately rest
with them.
4.4
The
Committee were content with the report and welcomed the proposed timescales for
implementation of recommendations and the potential influence officials may
have with the user group.
4.5
They
also made reference to officials being intelligent customers and exploring
every option, including outsourcing non-core functions. Dave explained that the Business Analysts
were involved early in the project process but not involved in specific
solution specification. Use of internal
knowledge and expertise would be supplemented with market research where
appropriate. The Procurement team would
advise on the appropriate framework before a business case was prepared.
4.6
A
substantial discussion took place with regards to the Security Vetting
audit. Gareth confirmed that management
had engaged positively with the audit and had accepted the recommendations in
the report.
Actions
- Dave to accelerate the
implementation of recommendations on the Security vetting audit.
- Gareth to update the Committee at
April meeting on implementation of all recommendations, as part of Internal
Audit recommendations monitoring.
- Dave to review the Welsh Government’s approach to bolstering vetting procedures.
Meeting: 10/11/2014 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 292
- Restricted enclosure 293
Minutes:
3.1
Gareth
Watts provided an update on progress against the 2014-15 programme of work
which was on course for delivery. He also updated the Committee on other
activity such as attendance at project board meetings.
3.2
He
reported that good progress had been made on the implementation of
recommendations which would be followed up in due course.
3.3
Dave
Tosh provided an update on progress against recommendations from the review of
information governance, where the focus had been on resolving practical issues
such as security of mobile assets and storage of information. The Committee
requested a presentation of the Information Governance Framework at the next
meeting.
3.4
Gareth
confirmed that the review of physical security was due to be completed in the
coming weeks and agreed to circulate the report to Committee members when it
had been approved.
3.5
The
Chair congratulated Kathryn Hughes, the Commission’s Risk Manager, on the
“strong” opinion on controls around risk management.
Actions
-
Gareth
Watts to formally document the feedback received from Committee members on reports
circulated over the summer, and his responses to this. Feedback and responses to be captured as a
matter of course in future for reports circulated out of committee.
-
Dave
Tosh to present the Information Governance Framework to the February meeting.
-
Gareth
Watts to circulate the report on the review of physical security when complete.
Meeting: 10/11/2014 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 296
- Restricted enclosure 297
- Restricted enclosure 298
- Restricted enclosure 299
- Restricted enclosure 300
- Restricted enclosure 301
Minutes:
4.1
Gareth
introduced the report on the review of fixed asset management, for which all
recommendations had been accepted and the follow-up report on the review of
facilities contract management.
4.2
In
response to questions from Committee members in relation to fixed assets,
Nicola Callow assured the committee that:
a.
the
Commission’s accountant would be working with ICT to identify assets which
needed to be capitalised;
b.
assets
over £5,000 would be picked up as part of the interim review of the accounts;
c.
serial
numbers for all assets would be recorded before the year-end; and
d.
an
assessment of exposure on leases had been carried out to prepare for any
impact.
4.3
Gareth
presented the report on the review of recruitment which had been carried out in
response to a request from the Chief Executive.
4.4
Claire
assured the Committee that the results of the audit were being used to inform a
series of improvements. This would include:
a.
the
development, by the Management Board, of a set of principles around
decision-making for recruitment;
b.
ensuring
that the policies, processes and guidance were coherent, accessible, regularly
reviewed and properly understood by staff;
c.
ensuring
that the adoption of the principles and policies, and the reasons for decisions
around recruitment exercises were transparent;
d.
ensuring
that thorough reviews were carried out for each recruitment exercise which
would include checks that records had been captured and retained in accordance
with records management rules and data protection legislation; and
e.
encouraging
better ownership of issues by Heads of Service around recruitment, development
and performance.
4.5
The
Committee endorsed this approach and emphasised the importance of transparency,
fairness, and effective record-keeping.
4.6
The
Chair also offered to work with the Head of HR to develop the recruitment
principles and review the underpinning policies and processes. The recruitment business case template would
be shared with Committee members.
4.7
Gareth
introduced the HR Payroll report via a presentation. The review was carried out by Gareth and Gwyn
Thomas, an independent expert.
4.8
This review
concentrated on the governance of the project, rather than the core
functionality of the system. Gareth
concluded that the scope was ambitious, the resources were limited and that the
timescales were fixed. These factors
contributed to delays in delivering phase 1 of the HR Payroll project.
4.9
His
report did not single out individuals, but highlighted recommendations around
questions that could have been raised by the Investment Board and Management
Board.
4.10 Committee members were surprised that individuals
with little or no project management experience were allocated to this
important and complex project and that such contradictory answers were given to
some of the questions asked of the project team.
4.11 Claire was disappointed and frustrated that this project was not executed to the normal standard of other high profile, complex projects within the Commission. She assured the Committee that for future projects of this scale, SROs and PMs would be selected at the Investment and Resourcing Board. Claire also confirmed ... view the full minutes text for item 4
Meeting: 07/07/2014 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Minutes:
3.1
Gareth
Watts provided an oral update to the Committee.
Since June, the Risk Management and Information Governance Management
audit reports had been completed but were awaiting clearance. The Committee agreed for these and other
reports to be circulated over the summer recess, along with the Recruitment
audit, which had generated a lot of interest throughout the organisation. The Equalities audit had also been scoped
and work would start shortly.
3.2
He had
attended the Assembly Commission meeting on 18 June, and presented his report
on their effectiveness. All
recommendations were accepted, and over the coming weeks he would meet with the
Secretariat to discuss an action plan.
He then went on to highlight some key findings in his report, including
their effective challenge of the ICT Futures programme and Machine Translation
project, but identified that their communication within the organisation could
be improved.
3.3
On 18
July, Gareth would be hosting a Head of Internal Audit inter-Parliamentary
forum with his counterparts from across the UK.
He would report on this at the November meeting.
Meeting: 09/06/2014 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 3)
Internal Audit Activity Report
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 306
- Restricted enclosure 307
- Restricted enclosure 308
- Restricted enclosure 309
- Restricted enclosure 310
Minutes:
3.1
Gareth
Watts provided an update in relation to the 2014-15 programme of work. 2013-14 work was detailed in his annual
report.
3.2
Since April
2014, he explained that he had continued to work with Dave Tosh and Alison
Rutherford on the Information Governance review. In response to a recent staff survey, he was
performing a Recruitment Procedures audit and aimed to produce a report before
the summer recess. TIAA were currently
scoping the Risk Management Framework audit.
3.3
He also
informed the Committee that he had completed follow up work on the Scheme of
Financial Delegation and the National Assembly for Wales shop. He would be
reporting to the Assembly Commission on 18 June following a review of their
effectiveness.
3.4
Following
a brief discussion on Business Continuity, the Committee urged officials to
accelerate this area of work and provide an update by November 2014.
3.5
Dave
Tosh explained that a mock plenary was held over the Easter recess which
specifically tested the manual voting procedures. Service areas have drafted plans, but they
were yet to be tested and refined. Work
may also be delayed over the summer recess with many of the service areas
taking their annual leave during this period.
3.6
Gareth
Watts introduced his annual report of work during the 2013-14 financial
year. The programme of work was
successfully delivered, despite the changes to internal audit in year, which included
both a new Head of Internal Audit and a new external contractor.
3.7
Committee
members questioned the definition of the opinion ‘Reasonable’. Gareth explained that this was a moderate
rating and that given the scope of the audits, was the highest achievable
score.
3.8
He
confirmed that he intended to carry out more full scope audits this year which,
potentially, could give a higher level of assurance.
3.9
Dave
Tosh mentioned the Information Governance area as an example of vast
improvement in the last 2-3 years. From
the 12 original recommendations, 4 remain outstanding in 2013-14. Tighter controls, clear policies and
structures were now in place. He was
hopeful that this improved position would be reflected in the update in
November.
3.10
Committee
members also questioned how the specific internal audit reviews were
selected. Officials confirmed that by
their very nature, internal audit chose areas of weakness in order for
improvements to be identified. Gareth’s
work would continue to focus on these areas.
3.11
The
Chair agreed that this was a constructive approach and that the Management
Board was taking the recommendations seriously and was acting in a positive way
to improve the functions within the organisation.
3.12
The
Annual report on Fraud was finalised mid-May and at the time of writing
provided a fair reflection of the position.
3.13
Lots of
positive work had taken place since this area was audited in November 2011,
especially access to policies and training by the Head of Procurement and from
the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply.
3.14 Gareth was considering Fraud Response plans across the public sector ... view the full minutes text for item 3
Meeting: 09/06/2014 - Senedd Commission Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Item 4)
Latest Internal Audit Reports
Supporting documents:
- Restricted enclosure 313
Minutes:
4.1
Vicky
Davies introduced this item which was a report on the migration of payroll data
following the HR and Payroll project.
This was a limited scope review, with a sample of 30 staff records
checked.
4.2
TIAA
assessed the controls surrounding Payroll – Data Migration as
’Reasonable’. The assessment related
only to Payroll Data Migration and excluded the wider new Payroll and HR system
project. 9 recommendations were made and
accepted.
4.3
Dave
Tosh, as a member of the HR Payroll project board, mentioned some issues
regarding the Commission’s relationship with the supplier and that the
additional resource seconded from Monmouthshire County Council was working well
in resolving outstanding issues. Actions
and resources were being re-planned and the Investment Board would be reviewing
the revised plans.
4.4
The
Chair asked for a follow up report to be provided in the autumn outlining the
project’s progress.
Actions
-
Mike
Snook (SRO, HR Payroll project) to provide an update for the Committee at the
November meeting.